SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Guj) 386

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI
AMAN PIYUSH KHANNA, THRO' FATHER & GUARDIAN PIYUSH KRISHNA & 4 - Petitioners
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT, THRO' SECRETARY & 1 - Respondents
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 5599 of 2009
With
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 5337 of 2009
With
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 5289 of 2009
With
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 5285 of 2009
With
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 6326 of 2009
With
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 6472 of 2009
Decided on : 08/07/2009

Advocates appeared
SCA 5599/2009 MR DC DAVE for Petitioner
MR KB TRIVEDI, ADVOCATE GENERAL WITH MR DEVANG VYAS,AGP & MS SANGEETA VISHEN, AGP for Respondent
SCA 5337/2009 MR DC DAVE for Petitioner
MR KB TRIVEDI, ADVOCATE GENERAL WITH MR DEVANG VYAS,AGP & MS SANGEETA VISHEN, AGP for Respondent
SCA 5289/2009 MR DC DAVE for Petitioner
MR KB TRIVEDI, ADVOCATE GENERAL WITH MR DEVANG VYAS,AGP & MS SANGEETA VISHEN, AGP for Respondent
MR. MITHUL SHELAT for Respondent
MR. HARSHIT TOLIA for Respondent
SCA 5285/2009 MR MB PARIKH for Petitioner
MR KB TRIVEDI, ADVOCATE GENERAL WITH MR DEVANG VYAS,AGP & MS SANGEETA VISHEN, AGP for Respondent
MR. SN SHELAT, SR ADVOCATE WITH MS VD NANAVATI for Respondent
SCA 6326/2009 MR KETAN D SHAH for Petitioner
MR KB TRIVEDI, ADVOCATE GENERAL WITH MR DEVANG VYAS,AGP & MS SANGEETA VISHEN, AGP for Respondent
SCA 6472/2009 MR MB PARIKH for Petitioner
MS MONALI BHATT, AGP for Respondent

Headnote:

Gujarat Professional Medical Educational Colleges (Regulation of Admission and Payment of Fees) Rules, 2009 - Rule 5 - Education - Petitioners have questioned the policy of the State Government to permit the students who have passed 12th standard in Science Stream in previous years also to compete for the Medical and Paramedical seats admissions to which is being granted in the academic year - Held, Unfortunately, nothing much seems to have changed since then - The Government continues to make last minute changes - This puts enormous pressure on parents and students which with little more effort and inclination and a little touch of sensitivity, can be avoided - This should be taken seriously by the Government and it is expected that admission rules for future years would be promulgated well in time so that all aspects of the admission process are at large before the students and parents and leave no room for doubt or debate at the last minute - Petitions dismissed.

JUDGMENT

(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)

PREAMBLE

1. In this group of petitions, though grievances raised in all petitions are not identical, they all pertain to the procedure for admissions to Medical and Paramedical Professional Courses for the academic year 2009-2010. These admissions are governed by Gujarat Professional Medical Educational Colleges (Regulation of Admission and Payment of Fees) Rules, 2009(here-in-after referred to as the Admission Rules of 2009). Since different facets of the Admission Rules of 2009 are involved in all the petitions and in some of the petitions some of the Rules are also under challenge, we find it convenient to dispose of all the petitions by a common judgment.

FACTUAL ASPECTS AND CONTENTIONS OF THE COUNSEL

2. In Special Civil Application No.5599/2009, the petitioners have questioned the policy of the State Government to permit the students who have passed 12th standard in Science Stream in previous years also to compete for the Medical and Paramedical seats admissions to which is being granted in the current year i.e. academic year 2009-2010. The petitioners have all passed the 12th standard examination in the academic year 2008-2009 in Gujarat Board. They have applied for admissions to various Medical and Paramedical courses on the basis of their performance in the qualifying examination as well as in the Common Entrance Test held by the respondents in the year 2009. They contend that admissions being granted for such courses in the academic year 2009-2010 should be confined exclusively for those students who have passed HSC examination in the academic year 2008-2009.

2.1 Rule 5 of the Admission Rules of 2009 provides for eligibility for admission. Rule 5(1)(B) of the Admission Rules of 2009, in particular, provides that for admission a candidate must have appeared in the Gujarat Common Entrance Test (here-in-after referred to as GUJCET )conducted in the current academic year. Sub-rule(5) of Rule 5 further provides that a candidate who has secured admission under these Rules in any year shall not be eligible for further admission to any course until the period within which he might have completed the course in which he has secured admission.

In the nutshell, therefore, under the the Admission Rules of 2009, the students who have passed the HSC examination in earlier academic years, can also apply for admissions to Medical and Paramedical courses provided i) they appear in the GUJCET for the current academic year and ii) such candidate if he has already taken admission in any course, he is not eligible to apply again till he completes the course. Apparently similar provisions were also made in Admission Rules of 2008.

2.2 Learned advocate Shri D.C. Dave for the petitioners vehemently contended that this policy of the State Government is illegal and unlawful and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. He pointed out that in the Admission Rules of 2009, merit list is prepared by giving 60% weightage to the marks obtained by a student in HSC examination and 40% weightage to the performance in GUJCET examination of the current year. His main contention therefore, was that by preparing a common merit list for students who have passed the HSC examinations in different academic years would amount to treating unequals as equals. In other words, he contended that the procedure evolved by the respondents treated results of HSC examinations of different years equally. Results of different years would vary and thus the respondents failed to provide for a common yardstick for judging the students. He submitted that since year 1984, admission rules for such courses permitted the students only of that particular academic year to apply in medical seats and such a rule was upheld by this Court in case of Jayesh A. Joshipura v. State of Gujarat and others reported in 1984(2)GLR 761, wherein Learned Single Judge was pleased to uphold the said policy of limiting the admission to MBBS course only








































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top