SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Guj) 1871

ALPESH Y.KOGJE
O. P. Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :M.J. Thakore, Senior Advocate assisted by Tarak Damani, Advocate
For the Respondent: H.K. Patel, APP

JUDGMENT :

ALPESH Y. KOGJE, J.

1. RULE. Learned Advocates Mr. B.D. Karia and Mr. Dipen Desai waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondent-complainant and learned APP Mr. H.K. Patel waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. This group of 27 petitions is arising from the same nature of offence which are registered by different complainants against almost same accused persons. In all, before this Court, criminal proceedings in five separate Criminal Cases are called for in question, i.e. Criminal Case Nos. 242 of 2013, 30 of 2012, 92 of 2012, 99 of 2012 and 175 of 2014. The case-wise petitions and reliefs claims can be segregated as under :-

  

Sr. No.

Petition No.

Petitioner/s

Complainant/s

Criminal Case No.

Prayers

Civil Suit No.

1.

Sp. Cr. A. No. 1345 of 2013

1. O. P. Agrawal

2. Mr. Narinder Gahlot

3. Mr. Saurabh Mittal

Mohanlal Nathulal Shah

24 of 2012

(B) To quash the proceedings being Criminal Case No. 242 of 2013 pending before the Ld. Additio






















































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top