ASHOKKUMAR C.JOSHI
Atul Amrutlal Modesara – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rule. Learned APP wavies service of rule on behalf of respondent-Sate and Mr.Sudhir Khanna, learned advocate wavies service of rule on behalf of respondent No.2.
1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Jayesh A. Dave for the petitioners original accused, learned APP Mr. Manan Mehta for the respondent No.1 State and its authorities and learned advocate Mr. Sudhir M. Khanna for respondent No.2 original complainant.
2. This petition has been preferred by the petitioners praying following reliefs:-
(c) Pending the hearing and/or final disposal of this petition be pleased to stay the implementation and execution of the order dated 13-1-2015 passed by the Ld. 6th Addl. Sessions Judge Bhuj-Kutchh in Criminal Revision Application No.119 of 2014 and also stay the further proceedings of criminal case No.1488 of 2007 pending in t
Banta singh Siyan Singh v. Gurubax singh Gurudit Singh 1967 CrLJ 1447
Basudev Bhoi v. Bipadabhanjan Puhari [(1997) 2 Crimes 331 (Ori.)
Dhananjaya Reddy v. State of Karnataka [AIR 2001 SC 1512]
Hamida v. Rashid [(2008) 1 SCC 474]
Kavita v. State & Ors. [2000 CR.L.J. 315]
Narendra sing. v. State of Punjab [2014 (6) SCC 466]
Parbhatbhai Ahir v. State of Gujarat [2017 (9) SCC 641]
R.P.Kapur v. State of Punjab [AIR 1960 SC 260]
State of Bhiar v. Murad Ali Khan [(1989) CR.L.J. 1005 : AIR 1989 SC 1]
State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal [AIR 1992 SC 604]
State of Andhra Pradesh v. Gourishetty Mahesh [2010 (6) SC 588: 2010 CR.L.J. 3844]
Valmiki Fleriyo Versus Mrs. Smt. Loriyana Farnandiz [2005 CR.L.J. 2498]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.