IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
J.B. PARDIWALA, J.
Madhavnagar Cooperative Housing Society Limited and Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Joint Registrar and Member, Board of Nominees and Ors. – Respondents
R/Special Civil Application No. 4585 of 2016
Decided On : 30-08-2019
Constitution of India -Article 226 - Writ-applicant no.1 is a society registered under the provisions of the Gujarat Cooperative Societies Act, 1961 - Writ-applicant no. 2 is the Chairman of the Society - One Niranjanaben Manubhai Patel was the member of the Society
Facts of the Case:
To issue a writ of certiorari or a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the order passed by respondent no.1 at Annexure-A to the petition and also ordered the application
Finding of the Court:
It is made clear that the officer or the officers concerned of the Corporation or any Municipality sanctions the plans or grants Building Use Permission without any valid No Objection Certificate from the Society, then he or she shall be held personally liable for dereliction of duty and shall also be held guilty of contempt. In future if it is found or noted by this Court that plans have been sanctioned or Building Use Permission has been granted without hearing the Society and without there being a valid No Objection Certificate on record issued by the Society, then appropriate steps shall be taken against such officers. I am saying so, because such officers would be equally liable for the illegal construction which the member puts up contrary to the bye-laws of the Society.
Result: Appeal allowed
JUDGMENT :
J.B. Pardiwala, J.
1. By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicants have prayed for the following reliefs:
"(A) be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the order dated 17.3.2016 passed by respondent no.1 at Annexure-A to the petition and also ordered the application at Exh. 5 in Lavad Case No. 104 of 2015 at Annexure-P to the petition be allowed;
(AA) Your Lordship will be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate order or direction quashing and setting aside the Development Plan dated 01/06/2016 and the BU Permission dated 06/06/2016 at Annexure-Y to the petition issued by the respondent no. 3.
(B) Pending admission and final disposal of this petition, Your Lordships will be pleased to restrain respondent no. 2 for utilizing the plot/bungalow no. 40 of petitioner no. 1 society or part thereof for any other purpose than residential purpose;
(BB) Your Lordships will be pleased to restrain the respondent no. 2 from utilizing the premises on Plot No. 40 or any part thereof for any other purpose than the residential purpose.
(C) Be pleased to award the cost of this petition;
(D) Such other and further relief that is just, fit and expedient in the facts and circumstances of the case may be granted."
2. The facts giving rise to this writ-application may be summarised as under:
3. The writ-applicant no.1 is a society registered under the provisions of the Gujarat Cooperative Societies Act, 1961. The writ-applicant no. 2 is the Chairman of the Society. One Niranjanaben Manubhai Patel was the member of the Society. She was the owner of the Bungalow No. 40 in the Society. Niranjanaben decided to sell her Bungalow No. 40 to the respondent no. 2 herein, namely, Shri Pankaj A. Karnavat.
4. In such circumstances, Niranjanaben preferred an application dated 24th February 2010 addressed to the Chairman of the Society, seeking permission to sell the Bungalow No. 40 to the respondent no. 2.
5. The respondent no. 2 also preferred an application dated 24th February 2010 addressed to the Chairman of the Society, seeking permission to purchase the Bungalow No. 40 in the Society from Niranjanaben Manubhai Patel.
6. The Society, vide letter dated 13th March 2010, granted permission to the respondent no. 2 to purchase the Bungalow No. 40 in the Society by admitting him as a nominal member.
7. On 20th June 2010, a meeting of the committee members of the Society was convened to discuss few issues relating to the administration of the Society and for the purpose of passing appropriate resolutions in that regard. One of the items in the agenda in the meeting of the Society was with respect to Niranjanaben Manubhai Patel resigning as a member of the Society and the sale of her Bungalow No. 40 in favour of the respondent no. 2.
8. In the said meeting, a resolution was passed permitting Niranjanaben Manubhai Patel to resign as a member of the Society on account of her financial difficulties. At the same time, the committee members also passed a resolution admitting the respondent no. 2 as a member of the Society by accepting the share transfer fees and also with a distinct understanding that the respondent no. 2 would abide by the bye-laws of the Society.
9. The respondent no. 2 executed an undertaking in writing on oath on a stamp paper duly notarized by the notary public stating as follows:
"I, Pankaj Ajitraj Karnavat, aged: 35, religion: Hindu, Occupation-Chartered Accountant, residing at: 1004, Padmakruti Apartment, City Light, Surat, C/o, Bungalow No. 40, Mahadevnagar Co.Op. Housing Society, Ltd., Surat, on this 20th day of June, 2010, Gujarati Samvat: 2066, Sunday, do hereby, enter into an agreement with Mahadev Nagar Co.Op. Housing Society, Majura Darwaja, Surat-395002 and admit that:-
(1) I shall act harmoniously with all the members and neighbours of the society and live peace
Babaji Kondaji Garad vs. Nasik Merchants Co. Op. Bank Ltd.
Chhotlal Vanravan Kakkad vs. The State of Gujarat and others
Chairman, Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board and others v. Shiv Narayan and another
Cooperative Central Bank Ltd. vs. Additional Industrial Tribunal Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad
Daman Singh vs. State of Punjab and others
Dadar Avanti Co-op Housing Society Ltd., Bombay vs. Municipal Corpn. Of Greater Bombay and others
Damyanti Naranga vs. Union of India
Dr. Devendra M. Surti v. The State of Gujarat
Harendra H. Mehta & Ors. v. Mukesh H. Mehta & Ors.
Greater Kailash Part II Welfare Association vs. DLF Universal Ltd.
Jain Merchant Co-op Housing Society Ltd. vs. HUF of Manubhai
K. Ramdas Shenoy vs. The Chief Officers, Town Municipal Council, Udipi and others
New Delhi Municipal Council v. Sohan Lal Sachdev
M.P. State Agro Industries Development Corporation vs. Jahan Khan
Ramesh Himmatlal Shah vs. Harsukh Jadhavji Joshi
Satyanarayan B. Sharma vs. A.L. Dineu
Sarjan Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. v. Surat Municipal Corporation and others
Sanwarmal Kejriwal vs. Vishwa Co-op Housing Society Ltd.
State of U.P. and another etc., v. C.O.D. Chheoki Employees' Coop. Society Ltd. and others etc.
State of Maharashtra vs. Karvanagar Sahakari Griya Rachana Sansthan Maryadit
V. Sasidharan v. Peter and Karunakar
Whirlpool Corporation vs. Registrar of Trade Marks
Zoroastrian Cooperative Housing Society Limited v. District Registrar, Cooperative Societies (Urban)
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.