BELA M.TRIVEDI, A.C.RAO
Anil Surendra Singh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Bela M. Trivedi, J.
1. Both the proceedings arise out of the self-same judgment and order dated 31.7.2019 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge (POCSO), Surat (hereinafter referred to as "the Special Court") in Special POCSO Case No. 223 of 2018, whereby the Special Court has convicted the appellant-accused for the offence under Sections 302, 363, 366, 376AB, 377 and 201 of IPC and under Sections 3(a), 4, 5(a), 5(r) and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as "the POCSO Act"), and has sentenced him to death penalty for the offence under Sections 302, 376AB of IPC and has awarded different punishments of different durations and directed to make payment of fine for the said offences. The Special Court has acquitted the accused for the offences under the Atrocities Act. The Special Court has not imposed separate punishment for the offence under Sections 3, 4, 5(a), 5(r) and 6 in view of Section 42 of POCSO Act. The appellant-accused has preferred the appeal under Section 374 of Cr.P.C., against the said jud
Ashokkumar Vs. State of Haryana
Aghnoo Nagesia Vs. State of Bihar
B.A. Umesh Vs. Registrar General, High Court of Karnataka
Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab
Dhananjoy Chatterjee alias Dhana v. State of West Bengal
Laxman Naik v. State of Orissa
Mohd. Mannan alias Abdul Mannan v. State of Bihar
Machhi Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab
Rajendra Pralhadrao Wasnik v. State of Maharashtra
Shivaji @ Dadya Shankar Alhat v. State of maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.