VIKRAM NATH, J.B.PARDIWALA
Twinkle Rahul Mangaonkar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
J.B. PARDIWALA, J.
1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:
Alternatively the Hon'ble Court be pleased to read down Rule 1 and Rule 2 and declare that a person who is otherwise qualified to be admitted as an advocate, but is either in full or part time service or employment or is engaged in any trade, business or profession, shall be admitted as an advocate, however the enrollment certificate of such a person shall be withheld with the Bar Council and shall lie in deposit with the Council, until the advocate makes a declaration that the circumstances mentioned in
Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation and Another vs. Nilaybhai R. Thakore and Another
Jalpa Pradeepbhai Desai vs. Bar Council of India
M. Pentiah vs. Muddala Veeramallappa
Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education vs. P.B. Mukarsheth
Namit Sharma vs. Union of India
S. Gopal Reddy vs. State of A.P. 1996 (4) SCC 596 : 1996 SCC (Cri) 792 : 1996 AIR (SC) 2184
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.