IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
B.N. KARIA, J.
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
AFROZ MOHMED HASANFATTA – Respondent
Criminal Revision Application No. 536 of 2021, Criminal Misc. Application No. 1 of 2022
Decided On : 24-05-2022
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION - DISCHARGE OF ACCUSED - SUFFICIENCY OF GROUNDS FOR PROCEEDING - WEIGHING OF EVIDENCE - SCOPE OF INQUIRY - SECTION 227 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant-State challenged the order passed by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural) in Sessions Case No. 181 of 2017 below Exh.56 dated 16.04.2021 by discharging the respondent herein from the charges levelled against him.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that the Trial Court has the undoubted power to sift and weigh the evidence for the limited purpose of finding out whether or not a prima facie case against the accused has been made out; where the materials placed before the court disclose grave suspicion against the accused which has not been properly explained the court will be fully justified in framing a charge and proceeding with the trial; by and large if two views are equally possible and the Judge is satisfied that the evidence produced before him gave rise to some suspicion but not grave suspicion against the accused, he will be fully justified to discharge the accused and in exercising jurisdiction under Section 227 Cr.P.C. the Judge cannot act merely as a post office or a mouthpiece of the prosecution, but has no consider the broad probabilities of the case, the total effect of the evidence and the documents produced before the court but should not make a roving enquiry into the pros and cons of the matter and weigh the evidence as if he was conducting a trial.
Issues: 1. Whether the Trial Court has the power to sift and weigh the evidence for the limited purpose of finding out whether or not a prima facie case against the accused has been made out? 2. Whether the Trial Court can discharge the accused if the materials placed before the court disclose grave suspicion against the accused which has not been properly explained?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. Yes, the Trial Court has the undoubted power to sift and weigh the evidence for the limited purpose of finding out whether or not a prima facie case against the accused has been made out. 2. Yes, the Trial Court can discharge the accused if the materials placed before the court disclose grave suspicion against the accused which has not been properly explained.
Final Decision: The Court dismissed the Criminal Revision Application filed by the applicant-State and upheld the order passed by the Trial Court discharging the respondent from the charges levelled against him.
JUDGMENT :
B.N. KARIA, J.
Criminal Revision Application No. 536 of 2021
1. The present applicant-State of Gujarat, by preferring this Criminal Revision Application under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “the Cr.P.C.” for short), has challenged the order dated 16.04.2021 passed by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural) in Sessions Case No. 181 of 2017 below Exh.56 by discharging the respondent herein from the charges levelled against him.
2. The short facts of the present case may be referred as under:
Century Spinning and Manufacturing Company Limited and Others vs. State of Maharashtra
Dilawar Balu Kurane vs. State of Maharashtra
AI
The court highlighted the necessity for a thorough evaluation of evidence before rejecting a discharge application, emphasizing that mere suspicion without substantial proof is insufficient for prose....
The court emphasized the importance of proving charges beyond reasonable doubt and considered the repayment of the dues by the accused and the expressed intention of the complainant to withdraw the c....
Point of Law : Hon’ble Supreme Court has observed that at stage of framing of charge, trial court is not to examine and assess in detail material produced by prosecution nor to consider sufficiency o....
The court upheld the necessity of trial for charges framed under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, emphasizing that prima facie evidence supports the petitioner’s involvement in fraudulent acti....
The extent of exercise of discretion by Court is limited to prima facie satisfaction of Court and if Court does not find reasonable grounds of suspicion against the Accused, it may discharge him of o....
At the charge framing stage, prima facie evidence must substantiate serious suspicion; the trial court is not to weigh evidence but must proceed based on materials presented by the prosecution.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.