JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned Senior Advocate Mr. Prakash Jani assisted by learned advocate Mr.Viral K. Shah for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Dhawan Jayswal for the respondent-State.

2. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Dhawan Jayswal waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent-State.

3. Facts in all these petitions are similar and they have therefore, been heard analogously and would be disposed of by this common judgment. The petitioner as well as the respondents are common in all these petitions.

4. For the sake of convenience, facts are recorded from Special Civil Application No.3762/2022.

5. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :

“(A) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing and setting aside the order dated 7.7/8.2020 passed by the Registrar rejecting the application and refusing to grant permission under Section 71 of the Act as also the order dated 20.1.2022 passed by the respondent No.1 rejecting Revision Application No.40 of 2020 and further