Back
A. J. DESAI, MAUNA M. BHATT
Abdulsattar R. Mansuri – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
ORDER :
A.J. Desai, J.
1. By way of present appeal under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, the appellant – original petitioner has challenged the common oral order dated 25.6.2018 passed in captioned writ petition i.e. Special Civil Application No.9024 of 2014 with Misc. Civil Application No.2 of 2015 in Special Civil Application No.13676/2009. In the impugned order, the learned Single Judge refused to grant any of the reliefs of the petitioner by not granting any pensionary and retiral benefits keeping his ad hoc services as Principal of District Institute of Education and Training (hereinafter referred to as “DIET”) from 12.8.1997 till his date of superannuation on 31.10.2009. The appeal came to be admitted on 3.10.2018 and was pending for final disposal.
2. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant has filed further affidavit dated 16.2.2022 (copy of which was supplied to the office of Government Pleader, High Court of Gujarat). Along with said additional affidavit, the appellant has produced several orders passed by learned Single Judge, confirmed in Letters Patent Appeal as well as the order of Hon’ble Supreme Court confirming the order of learned Single Judge as well as Divisi
Ad hoc services should be considered as qualifying service for pensionary benefits under Rule 25 of the Gujarat Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2002.
Ad hoc services can be considered as qualifying service for pensionary benefits under Rule 25 of the Gujarat Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2002.
Ad-hoc service can qualify for pension benefits under the Gujarat Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2002, if the service is continuous and in a sanctioned post.
Once it is settled that the ad hoc service, which has been made basis of regularization, has been considered in catena of judgments and it has been held that the same is countable for reckoning the q....
petitioner has rendered qualifying pensionery service with effect from the date of his initial joining in the department in question, so the same shall be treated as service qualifying for pension an....
Ad hoc service followed by regularization counts as qualifying service for pension and gratuity under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, Rule 13, preventing discriminatory exclusion of prior service.
Ad hoc service can qualify for family pension if the employee has completed over five years of service, as per the Gujarat Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2002.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
