SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Guj) 1260

BIREN VAISHNAV
PATEL MEGHNA MOTIBHAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: GAURAV CHUDASAMA.
For the Respondents: M.P. PRAJAPATI, UTKARSH SHARMA.

JUDGMENT :

BIREN VAISHNAV, J.

1. RULE returnable forthwith. Learned advocates waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respective respondents.

2. Mr. Gaurav Chudasama, learned counsel for the petitioners, places reliance on a decision rendered by this Court in Special Civil Application No. 144 of 2019 to submit that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by the decision rendered in the aforesaid petition, which reads as under:

    “1. Rule. Learned advocates appearing for the respective respondents waive service of notice of rule.

2. At the outset, learned advocate Mr. Gaurav Chudasama appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the issue is squarely covered by the decision of this Court dated 16.10.2019 passed in Special Civil Application No. 20873 of 2015, which is confirmed by the Division Bench vide order dated 28.01.2021 passed in Letters Patent Appeal No. 630 of 2020.

3. Learned advocate Mr. Gaurav Chudasama for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is claiming the absorption in the regular pay-scale of Rs. 5,200-20,200/- after completion of 2 years. He has submitted the case of the petitioner is denied by the respondents only while placing relian

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top