IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Biren Vaishnav, J.
Yogiji Petroleum & others – Petitioners
Versus
State of Gujarat & others – Respondents
R/Special Civil Application No. 9265 of 2016
Decided On : 07-11-2022
NOC - Challenge to Issuance of No Objection Certificate (NOC) - The court dismissed the petition challenging the issuance of NOC for setting up an underground tank and distillation, as it was found that the fuel station was not located within a distance of 1000 meters from any barrier, in compliance with the norms. The court also considered the guidelines issued by the Ministry of Railways and the Indian Roads Congress Guidelines, 2009, and concluded that the NOC was not required for the proposed location of the petrol pump.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the issuance of No Objection Certificate (NOC) to set up an underground tank and distillation, citing violation of clause 4.7 of the Norms For Location, Layout And Access To Fuel Stations Along National Highways.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the fuel station was not located within a distance of 1000 meters from any barrier, in compliance with the norms. It also considered the guidelines issued by the Ministry of Railways and the Indian Roads Congress Guidelines, 2009, and concluded that the NOC was not required for the proposed location of the petrol pump. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition and discharged the notice, vacating any interim relief.
Issues: Challenge to the issuance of NOC based on violation of clause 4.7 of the Norms For Location, Layout And Access To Fuel Stations Along National Highways.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the compliance of the proposed fuel station with the norms and guidelines, as well as the absence of requirement for NOC based on the location of the petrol pump.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition challenging the issuance of NOC and discharged the notice, vacating any interim relief.
ORDER :
1. Heard learned advocates for the respective parties.
2. By way of this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging the issuance of No Objection Certificate (NOC) in favour of respondent no. 4 by which no objection has been granted to the respondent no. 4 to set up an underground tank and distillation bearing T.P Scheme no. 2 Plot No. 155/1/paiki village Anand, Ta. Dist. Anand. Challenge to the issuance of the NOC to respondent no. 4 is essentially on the ground that the same is in violation of clause no. 4.7 of the Norms For Location, Layout And Access To Fuel Stations Along National Highways (for short ‘the norms’).
3. Mr. Hemang Parikh, learned counsel for the petitioner would read out clause 4.7 of the norms to indicate that the fuel station would not be located within a distance of 1000 meters from any barrier including that of a toll plaza and railway level crossing. No check barrier, toll plaza should be situated within 1000 meters of a fuel station. In support of his submission, Mr. Parikh would rely on communications addressed by the District Magistrate/Collector, Anand to the Divisional Manager, Western Railways and that to the Additional Divisional Engineer, Anand seeking an opinion as to whether a petrol pump/fuel station was in compliance of the norm being 4.7 of the Norms referred to hereinabove. Essentially the point of challenge therefore is that since it is located within a 1000 meter distance of a railway barrier, the NOC is contrary to the norms and therefore be set aside.
3.1 Mr. Parikh would rely on a decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of Subhash Khobra vs. State of Haryana and Others rendered in Civil Writ Petition No. 21006 of 2020 on 16.12.2020.
4. Mr. Kunal Nanavati, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 3 would draw the court’s attention to the affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of the company and submit that the petition is misconceived inasmuch as the petrol pump was not proposed to be set up on a national highway and therefore there was no need for the authorities to procure any opinion/NOC from the department of railways. He submitted that therefore the submission of learned advocate for the petitioner is misconceived. He would rely on the guidelines dated 25.06.2015 and submit that as per the guidelines issued by the Ministry of Railways, the NOC is required from the ministry only for construction within 30 meters from the railway line. In the present case, the distance between the railway line and proposed petrol pump was 180 meters and therefore no NOC was required.
5. Ms. Dhwani Tripathi, learned AGP for the State would also rely on the affidavit-in-reply filed by the District Magistrate, Anand. Reliance was placed particularly on para 11 thereof which indicates that the petrol pump was located on the local road of the Nagarpalika and not on the highways. Clause 4.7 of the norms would therefore not apply. She submitted that even otherwise it is at a distance of 180 meters away from the central point of the railway line which is in compliance of the Indian Roads Congress Guidelines, 2009, particularly clause 4.2.3 thereof.
6. Mr. Jay Thakkar, learned advocate appearing for respondent no. 4 has raised objection as to the maintainability of the petition on the ground that essentially it is a case of motivated litigation of a competitor. He would also otherwise argue that the permission so granted in accordance with the compliance of the Indian Roads Congress Guidelines, 2009 as it is within the state vicinity.
7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsels for the respective parties, essentially the petitioners harping on clause 4.7 of the norms which are norms applicable for setting up of fuel stations on national highways is not the case here. Reading of the affidavits filed on behalf of the company as well as the State would indicate that the fuel outlet was set up in a local area on the road in the vicinit
AI
Compliance with location norms and guidelines, and the absence of requirement for NOC based on the proposed location of the petrol pump.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the cancellation of a No Objection Certificate must be justified under the relevant rules and guidelines, and the court's decision was base....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of adhering to IRC Regulations and Central Pollution Control Board Guidelines in the establishment of petrol bunks, emphasizing t....
IRC guidelines are directory for State Highways, and competitors can challenge violations, but the petition was dismissed for lack of merit.
The court upheld that urban fuel stations are exempt from minimum distance requirements under the NHAI guidelines to ensure public access.
The court ruled that competition in business does not justify restraining operations of a legal entity unless fundamental rights are infringed, affirming the legality of setting up fuel stations acco....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.