SONIA GOKANI, NISHA M. THAKORE
HARIOM S/O BABULAL MEENA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Draft amendment is allowed. Necessary amendment shall be carried out today itself.
2. Notice returnable forthwith. Mr. Nikunt Raval, learned Senior Standing Counsel waives service of notice for and on behalf of respondents.
3. The challenge in this petition is to the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ahmedabad in Original Application No. 362 of 2022 on the ground of challenge of Circular dated 20.09.2018 and the same having been upheld by the Apex Court in case of S.K. Nausad Rahaman and Others vs. Union of India and Others, AIR 2022 SC 1494. The original application is disposed of with the observations that the representation if made by the applicants regarding the grievance is within one month before the competent authority, the same shall be decided as per the law in light of the judgment of the Apex Court within two months from the receipt of the representation.
4. Prayers of the present petition are as follows:
(B) Be pleased to allow the present petition.
(i) quash and
S.K. Nausad Rahaman and Others vs. Union of India and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.