Back
BIREN VAISHNAV
Kishorkumar Ratilal Bavriya – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The prayer of the petitioners is to direct the respondents to treat the petitioners retirement date as on 01st July of the relevant year and direct them to pay the last increment which falls due on 01st July of the relevant year as they have retired on 30th June of the relevant year.
2. In the submission of Ms. Kruti Shah, learned counsel for the petitioners, the issue is now covered by a Division Bench decision of this Court rendered in Letters Patent Appeal No. 868 of 2021, which read as under :
2. This Letters Patent Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act, is directed against order dated 11.8.2021 of learned Single Judge whereby the Special Civil Application filed by the petitioner-respondent No.1 herein came to be allowed. The respondents were directed to grant benefit of one increment to the petitioner and accordingly revise his pension.
2.1 The petitioner prayed in his petition to set aside communication dated 6.1.2021. By the said communication the pe
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of an employee to receive the increment on 1st July even though he had retired on 30th June, as supported by the interpretation of ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of employees to the benefit of increment falling due on the 1st of July, even if they had retired on 30th June, based on the interp....
Government servants are entitled to receive annual increments even after retirement, based on their good conduct for a specified period, as per the provisions of F.R. CSR, Central Civil Services (Pen....
Government servants are entitled to increments becoming payable on 1st July even after retirement, and denying a government servant the benefit of annual increment which he has already earned while r....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the entitlement to receive increment crystallizes when the government servant completes requisite length of service with good conduct, and any....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of a government servant to receive an increment becoming payable on 1st July even after retirement, as interpreted in various judgm....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that government servants are entitled to annual increment becoming payable on the succeeding day, even after retirement, and denying this entitleme....
The entitlement to receive increment crystallizes when the government servant completes requisite length of service with good conduct and becomes payable on the succeeding day, and denying a governme....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
