Back
ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE
Dahyabhai Laljibhai Parmar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The present Special Civil Application is filed praying for the following reliefs:-
B) That pending the hearing and final disposal of this petition, Your Lordships be pleased to direct the respondents to consider last one increment of their services which falls due on 1st July though the petitioners retired on 30th June;
C) Any other appropriate reliefs deemed just, fit and proper may pleased be grated.”
2. The factual matrix in the present case is that the petitioners herein retired from the service on 01.06.2020, 01.06.2008, 30.06.2016, 01.06.2015, 01.06.2016, 30.06.2016 and 30.06.2015 respectively, on attaining the age of superannuation. It is the c
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of a government servant to receive an increment becoming payable on 1st July even after retirement, as interpreted in various judgm....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the entitlement to receive increment crystallizes when the government servant completes requisite length of service with good conduct, and any....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that government servants are entitled to annual increment becoming payable on the succeeding day, even after retirement, and denying this entitleme....
The entitlement to receive increment crystallizes when the government servant completes requisite length of service with good conduct and becomes payable on the succeeding day, and denying a governme....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the entitlement to receive increment crystallizes when the government servant completes requisite length of service with good conduct and beco....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that government servants are entitled to annual increment after retirement, as the increment becomes payable on the succeeding day and denying it w....
Government servants are entitled to annual increments after retirement for the services rendered over a year with good behavior and efficiency, as interpreted by the Division Bench of the Court and t....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of a government servant to annual increment after retirement, emphasizing that denying the benefit earned through good conduct and ....
Employees entitled to notional increment earned before retirement despite accruing post-retirement, based on satisfactory prior service.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
