NIRAL R. MEHTA
KAMLESHKUMAR C. DAVE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
NIRAL R. MEHTA, J.
1. By way of this Special Criminal Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioner who has been appointed as Special Public Prosecutor, District Devbhoomi Dwarka, prays as under:
(B) This Hon’ble Court be pleased to grant leave for withdrawal from prosecution of Criminal Case No. 696 of 2008 pending before court of Ld. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khambhaliya, District Devbhumi Dwarka, as provided under Section 321 of Cr.P.C.
(C) During the pendency and final disposal of the application, this Hon’ble Court be pleased to stay the further proceedings of Criminal Case No. 696 of 2008 pending before Court of Ld. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khambhaliya, District Devbhumi Dwarka.
(D) This Hon’ble Court be pleased to grant such other and further reliefs and/or order as deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice.”
2. Brief facts of the case can be summarized as under:
Bairam Muralidhar vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
The duty of the Public Prosecutor to exercise discretion with utmost care and circumspection, and not to act under pressure from higher authorities.
The ultimate guiding consideration for withdrawal from prosecution must be the interest of administration of justice, and the Public Prosecutor must apply independent judgment.
Withdrawal of prosecution under Section 321 Cr.P.C. requires court's consent, ensuring genuine public interest and good faith without disturbance to public order.
The withdrawal of criminal prosecution under Section 321 Cr.P.C. requires the Public Prosecutor to act independently in the interest of justice, and while the court has the final authority to consent....
The withdrawal of prosecution under Section 321 of the Cr.P.C. must be in the interest of public policy and justice, and the court must ensure that the executive function of the public prosecutor has....
Withdrawal of prosecution under Section 321 CrPC is justified when the offence is trivial, the accused show reformation, and public interest is served.
Prosecutors must exercise independent judgment when seeking consent to withdraw charges, failing which may undermine public justice and judicial processes.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.