VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI
Pravinbhai Balchandrabhai Premal – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard Mr. Asim Pandya, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Vicky B. Mehta, learned advocate appearing for the applicant and Ms. Maithili D. Mehta, learned APP appearing for the respondent no.1-State.
2. The brief facts of the present case are that, the applicant herein is a government servant, who was appointed as Field Supervisor in Gujarat State Land Development Corporation on 26.07.1990 and was posted at Chhotaudepur. The applicant was promoted to the post of Soil Conservation Officer w.e.f. 04.01.2017 and was posted at Dharampur of District: Valsad. At that time, he was also given the additional charge as Assistant Director, Soil Conservation, Class-II, w.e.f. 04.01.2007. The applicant in total was having duties of two districts, viz. Valsad and Navsari and also having additional charge of Asst. Director, Ahwa-Dang from 04.01.2017.
3. That multiple F.I.R.s came to be filed, the details of the said F.I.R. as stated by the applicant herein, are as follows :
| Sr. No. | Police Station | F.I.R. No. | F.I.R. date | Period of offence | Sections |
| 1. | Valsad and Dan | ||||
The court emphasized the principles of clubbing FIRs and the treatment of subsequently registered FIRs as statements under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, ensuring that bail granted in....
The court emphasized the specific nature of the offenses under different State enactments and recent judgments in declining to grant the relief sought by the petitioner under Article 32 of the Consti....
Multiple FIRs alleging identical offences cannot be consolidated if they arise from distinct transactions involving different complainants and evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.