SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Guj) 1574

NIRZAR S. DESAI
Yatrik Vinodrai Purohit – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms. J.K. Hingorani.
For the Respondent: Ms. Foram Trivedi AGP.

ORDER :

1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for compassionate appointment or lumpsum compensation in lieu of compassionate appointment as per Government Resolution dated 05.07.2011.

2.1 It is the case of the petitioner that father of the petitioner was working as Assistant Teacher with the Respondent No.4 – School since 02.09.1985. He expired on 18.07.2002 while on service. In view of death of the father of the petitioner on 18.07.2002, the petitioner made an application for compassionate appointment on 03.10.2002 within prescribed time limit of six months. However, at the time of death of father of the petitioner, the petitioner was minor and, therefore, he was not entitled to get compassionate appointment and hence his case could not be considered.

2.2 It is stated in the petition that in the year 2006, the petitioner attained the age of majority and thereafter once again the petitioner preferred an application for compassionate appointment vide application dated 21.01.2006 which was forwarded by respondent school to the Respondent No.3. However, vide order dated 30.09.2008, the Respondent No.2 rejected the aforesaid application made by the petitioner for compassio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top