SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Guj) 1398

A. S. SUPEHIA
HARSH KAUSHIKKUMAR BAROT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: DEVDIP BRAHMBHATT.
For the Respondent: SUMAN J. MOTLA.

ORDER :

1. The present petition has been filed for the following prayers:

    “(B) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order in the nature of writ, directing the respondent no. 2 to issue necessary order giving the present petitioner compassionate service in lieu of his father in the Police Department.

(C) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, o direction or order in the nature of writ, directing the respondent no. 2 to pay monetary benefits to the dependents of the deceased as per the Government Resolution dated 05.07.2011.”

2. The first prayer would indicate that the petitioner is seeking a direction for compassionate appointment, whereas the another prayer pertains to grant of monetary benefits, as per the Government Resolution dated 05.07.2011.

3. The father of the petitioner-Kaushikkumar Dasrathbhai Barot was working as a Police Constable in the Home Department of the Government of Gujarat. He died on 16.11.2004 due to heart-attack. Accordingly, the mother of the present petitioner-Jignaben, since she was not 10th Standard passed, which is minimum requirement as per the Government Resolution for qualifying for compassionate appoi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top