Back
GITA GOPI
Sarojben Amrutlal Mistry (Gajjar) – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The present application has been filed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing and setting aside the FIR being C.R. No.I-193 of 2019 registered before the Sabarmati Police Station, Dist.: Ahmedabad City for offence punishable under Sections 498A, 323, 294(kh) & 114 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 & 7 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
2. Learned advocate for the applicants, submitted that the parties have settled the disputes amicably outside the Court and that there remains no grievance between them. Therefore, in the larger interest of the society, the impugned complaint may be quashed and set aside.
2.1 Learned advocate submitted that the Court may verify the said aspect from the original complainant - respondent no.2.
3. Mr.Dipen Chaudhary, learned advocate submits that he is appearing for respondent No.2 – original complainant. He is permitted to file his Vakaltnama.
4. Advocate Mr.Chaudhary, for respondent No.2 - original complainant, concurred with the factum of settlement of the dispute, as advanced by learned advocate appearing for the applicants.
5. The original complainant – Hiral Wife of Jitesh Amrutbhai Mistry, who is present before the
The Court can exercise inherent powers under section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings based on a settlement between the parties, especially in cases with a private or civil nature, to prevent ....
whether incorporation of Section 307 IPC is there for the sake of it or the prosecution has collected sufficient evidence, which if proved, would lead to framing the charge under Section 307 IPC
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
