BHARGAV D. KARIA
Bhaskar Prabhudas Parekh – Appellant
Versus
Bank of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard learned advocate Mr.Rajesh Parekh with learned advocate Mr.Viral V. Dave for the petitioner and learned Senior Advocate Mr. R.S. Sanjanwala with learned advocate Ms.Anushree M. Soni for the respondent.
1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned advocate Ms.Anushree M. Soni waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent.
2. By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :
(B) Your Lordship may be pleased to set aside the order below Ex.1 dtd 24-9-19 passed by the Appellate Tribunal Mumbai on Appeal No. 7 of 2014 should be quashed and set aside and the orders of DRT1 Ahmedabad dtd 18-4-13 in SA 81/12 and order dtd 3- 11-15 in MA 66 of 2015 should be restored without any interruption till the refund of amount paid by the petitioner i.e Rs. 25,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Lakh only) to the Respondent Bank with interest of 9% p.a. till full payment to the present applicant along with damages, mesne profit occurred thereupon.
(C) Cost of the present application to be recovered from the respondent Bank.
(D) Your Lordship
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.