IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Aravind Kumar, Ashutosh J. Shastri, JJ.
Anjaneya Corporation – Petitioner
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
R/Special Civil Application No. 6272 of 2022
Decided On : 28-11-2022
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226, 227, 14 - Bidding process - Bid document being totally unjust - Direction quashing and setting Bid Document as being totally unjust illegal and arbitrary and tailor made to suit specific participants in bidding process, in interest of justice - Held, If Court finds that there is total arbitrariness or that tender has been granted in a malafide manner, still Court should refrain from interfering in grant of tender but instead relegate parties to seek damages for wrongful exclusion rather than to injunct execution of contract - Injunction or interference in tender leads to additional costs on State and is also against public interest - Therefore, State and its citizens suffer twice, firstly by paying escalation costs and secondly, by being deprived of infrastructure for which present-day Governments are expected to work - From aforesaid proposition of law laid down by Hon’ble Apex Court in addition to issues raised, Court have also satisfied on decision making process by an authority and court find no error - Accordingly, it is not possible for this Court to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction looking to present background of facts – Court is of opinion that no case is made out by petitioner to call for any interference - Petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Ashutosh J. Shastri, J.
1. By way of this petition under Article 226/ 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-
(B) Your lordships be pleased to quash and side the work order granted in the favor of Respondent no. 3, and be further pleased to direct respondent no. 2 to float the bid for supply for Preshcool Education For Anganwadi Children in Gujarat, afresh with reasonable participation criteria, allowing fair participation of all eligible bidders interest of justice.
(C) Pending hearing admission and final disposal of this petition, your lordships be pleased to pass an order staying execution, implementation and operation and taking of any further steps towards implementation of Bid Document NO. GEM/2022/B/1955944 dated. 18.02.2022 and subsequent corrigendum dated. 25.02.2022 for the supply for Preshcool Education For Anganwadi Children in Gujarat in the interest of justice.
(D) Your lordships be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order, or direction, directing the respondents to frame the Guidelines to be followed while conducting tendering/e-tendering process maintaining integrity, impartiality, transparency and upholding fair competition and the best financial interests of the state exchequer, as well as the participants in the interest of justice.
(E) Your lordships be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to get an Audit, through the respective wing of the CAG to be done, so that any loopholes in the system may be detected, and integrity, impartiality, transparency, fair competition and the best financial interests of the state exchequer, as well as the participants, are maintained in the interest of justice.
(F) Your Lordships may kindly be pleased to pass such other or further order or relief that may be deemed just fit and proper in the interest of justice.
2. The case of the petitioner is that petitioner is a proprietorship firm and is one of the leading manufactures and suppliers of preschool kits. Commissioner of Woman and Child Development, Gujarat State authority published a tender document No.GEM/2022/B/955944 providing preschool education kit for Anganwadi children in Gujarat (Q-3) through its e-market place GeM. Public procurements which are made through GeM have to follow general terms and conditions of portal and it clearly stipulates that resulting contract shall be governed by General Terms and Conditions (GTC) unless petitioner supersedes by some special terms. According to the petitioner, original bid document lays down buyers specifications documents wherein no criteria is laid down in the said document, craft out a highly customized set of requirements which cannot be available immediately through manufacture or procurement with immediate effect.
3. Petitioner is not convenient with the terms and conditions which are stipulated in the tender document consisting of additional buyer added specific terms and conditions as well as disclaimer clause which is a part of the tender document. By indicating that samples are called in advance which is not the criteria laid down by GeM and as such, is not just and proper on the part of the authority to insist.
4. It has been stated in the petition that when bid is opened on 18.2.2022, it was not possible for the petit
National Highway Authority of India Vs. Gwalior Jhansi Expressway Limited
Silppi Constructions Contractors Vs. Union of India and Another
Yashwant Sinha and others Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Judicial review of tender conditions is restricted to cases of arbitrariness or unreasonableness, reinforcing that the authority determining eligibility criteria has the discretion and expertise in c....
The court affirmed that stringent eligibility criteria in public tender processes cannot violate statutory relaxations for Start-ups, emphasizing limited grounds for judicial review.
Tender conditions upheld as reasonable for bidder integrity, safety and compliance; judicial review in contracts limited to arbitrariness, mala fides or public interest, with deference to administrat....
Judicial review of tender conditions is limited; courts should not interfere unless actions are arbitrary, discriminatory, or mala fide, ensuring public interest is prioritized.
Judicial review of tenders limited to arbitrariness or malafide; eligibility conditions upheld if public interest served with multiple qualified bidders; bid time reduction valid with approval; ineli....
Judicial review in public procurement is limited; courts refrain from interference unless clear evidence of arbitrariness or bad faith is established.
District Collector is not empowered to consider the aspect of alteration of any route or alignment except to remove difficulties faced by the licensee. As a result of this, even the request of altern....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.