Back
NIRZAR S. DESAI
Kalpeshkumar Yogendrasinh Zala – Appellant
Versus
Director General Of Police – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing and setting aside the order dated 27.04.2018 whereby the petitioner was declared unfit on the ground of on examination of his eyes, it was found that there was defect in eyes, the petitioner’s appointment as Lokrakshak was cancelled. The petition was amended subsequently by way of amended prayer, the petitioners has also prayed to direct the respondent authority to appoint the petitioner at any post in administration.
2. Heard learned advocate Ms. Mamta Vyas for the petitioner and learned AGP Mr. Niraj Sharma for the respondent – State.
3. It is the case of the petitioner that in the year 2016 an advertisement for the post of unarmed Police Constable (Lokrakshak) was published and pursuant to the said advertisement, the petitioner applied for the said post and on clearing the necessary exam,, he was appointed as Unarmed Police Constable and his name figured at Sr. No. 34 in the select list.
4. Once the petitioner cleared the examination and necessary training was taken for that. The petitioner was appointed as Unarmed Police Constable vide appointment order dated 18.05.2017. Thereafter, the petitioner’s medic
Disqualification -In case any candidates are sought to be disqualified on the ground that they suffer from colour blindness, there has to be a specific provision in the rules providing for such disqu....
Though the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of service from the date when he should have ordinarily been appointed on being selected, yet it would not be appropriate to treat the earlier period ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
