Back
SANGEETA K. VISHEN
MAHESHBHAI BHURJIBHAI DAMOR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANGEETA K. VISHEN, J.
1. With the consent of the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties, the matter is taken up for final disposal.
2. Issue Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr. Dhawan Jayswal, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondents.
3. The observations made by this Court in the case of Bodu Tarmamad vs. District Superintendent of Police, Jamnagar, 1988 (1) GLH 406 bearing analogous facts are very much apt to decide the present controversy:
4. This Court has held that while branding a particular behaviour as misconduct, the first question which is required to be posed is, has this conduct any nexus with the
Dismissal from police service upholds under Article 311 without inquiry due to impracticality of witness testimony related to serious sexual misconduct.
Dismissal from service matter - Rule 23 of Rules of 1991 clearly indicate that provisions of Revision are not mandatory in nature and are clearly at discretion of Officer whose appeal has been reject....
The principles of natural justice require that a delinquent employee be given a copy of the preliminary enquiry report before the disciplinary authority arrives at its conclusions with regard to the ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
