SANGEETA K. VISHEN
Narenbhai Gunvantlal Jayaswal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. With the consent of the learned advocates for the respective parties, the captioned writ petition has been taken up for final disposal.
2. Issue Rule. Mr.Bharat Vyas, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of Rule on behalf respondent Nos.1 and 3. Learned advocate Mr.C.P. Champaneri waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent No.5. Though served, respondent Nos.2 and 4 have chosen not to enter appearance.
3. By this petition, the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for quashing and setting aside the requisition dated 18.01.2021 whereby, the elected members of the Chhota Udepur Nagarpalika have forwarded a requisition for moving motion of no confidence against the petitioner.
4. The edifice on which, the requisition dated 18.01.2021 has been challenged, is, it being unconstitutional and ultra-vires Articles 14, 16 and 243 of the Constitution of India as well as against the principles laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Vipulbhai M. Chaudhary vs. Gujarat Co-operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited reported in (2015) 8 SCC 1 and in the case of Shivangiben Chetankumar Patel vs. State of Gujarat reported in 2019 (2) GLR 865.
5. The facts of the cas
Vipulbhai M. Chaudhary vs. Gujarat Co-operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited
Shivangiben Chetankumar Patel vs. State of Gujarat
State of Karnataka vs. Appa Balu Ingale
Kedar Nath Singh vs. State of Bihar
Bhanumati vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
D.A.V. College Trust and Management Society vs. Director of Public Instructions
Union of India v/s. Namit Sharma
Bharat Aluminium Company v/s. Kaiser Aluminum Technical Service Inc.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.