A. Y. KOGJE, M. R. MENGDEY
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Rameshbhai Punjabhai Rathod – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.Y. KOGJE, J.
1. Present Appeal is preferred by the State under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the acquittal recorded by the judgment and order dated 04.11.1996 passed in Sessions Case No.55 of 1993 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amreli. By which three respondents-accused have been acquitted for the offences under Sections-302, 504, 114 and under Section-326 read with 114 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The appeal came to be admitted by order dated 17-07-1997.
3. This is the case, which arose out of an incident, which took place on 08-03-1993, where allegedly three respondents-accused aged between 18 years to 21 years, had carried out assault on one Rajeshgiri, Dipakgiri and Hashmukhbhai and the deceased; Girishbhai.
4. It is the case where one of the injured witness doubting that the accused No.3; Pravin @ Punjabhai Rathod had taken the wristwatch, while they were together at the festival of ‘Holi’ and while removing coconut from the ‘Holi’ fire, wrist-watch of the witness had slipped out of his hand and perhaps taken by the accused No.3; Pravin, but did not return it to the witness. As a result, witness complained to his elder brothers, who ar
The principle of double presumption in favor of the accused in case of acquittal and the need for the prosecution to prove the offence beyond reasonable doubt.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for reliable evidence in criminal cases, especially in appeals against acquittal.
The judgment emphasizes the principles regarding the powers of the Appellate Court in dealing with appeals against acquittals, including the double presumption in favor of the accused and the require....
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony undermine the case against the accused.
While dealing with judgment of acquittal, unless reasoning by learned trial Court is found to be perverse, acquittal cannot be upset. It is further observed that High Court's interference in such app....
The need for consistent and credible witness testimonies to establish guilt, and the limited scope of interference by the appellate court in case of acquittal.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the significance of motive in a murder case, the burden on the prosecution to establish motive, and the weight of direct evidence in establishin....
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal, emphasizing the necessity of clear evidence for conviction and the presumption of innocence in criminal cases.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.