A. Y. KOGJE, M. R. MENGDEY
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
HARIBHAI RATNABHAI AALGOTAR – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.Y. KOGJE, J.
1. The present appeal preferred by the appellant-State is against the judgment and order dated 31.08.1994 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhavnagar recording acquittal of 13 accused persons, who were charged for the offence under Section 302, 147, 148, 149, 323, 324 and 325 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act in Sessions Case No. 121 of 1993.
2. The State has preferred an appeal against all the 13 accused persons acquitted, however, by order dated 01.05.1996, this Court admitted the appeal only qua respondent nos. 1, 2. 5, 6 and 7, whereas remaining respondents-accused viz. accused no. 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13, the appeal came to be dismissed.
3. It is reported that pending the appeal, the respondent nos. 5 and 7 have expired and therefore, qua these two accused i.e. accused no. 5-Panchabhai Jivabhai Aalgotar and accused no. 7-Natha Jivabhai Aalgotar, the appeal stands abated. Therefore, effectively, the present appeal is against the accused no. 1-Haribhai Ratnabhai Aalgotar, accused no. 2-Bhopabhai Ratnabhai Aalgotar and accused no. 6-Rajabhai Jivabhai Aalgotar.
4. It was the case of prosecution that on account of alleged i
The judgment emphasizes the principles regarding the powers of the Appellate Court in dealing with appeals against acquittals, including the double presumption in favor of the accused and the require....
The need for consistent and credible witness testimonies to establish guilt, and the limited scope of interference by the appellate court in case of acquittal.
The principle of double presumption in favor of the accused in case of acquittal and the need for the prosecution to prove the offence beyond reasonable doubt.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for reliable evidence in criminal cases, especially in appeals against acquittal.
The court upheld the acquittal due to insufficient evidence of intent to kill, emphasizing the presumption of innocence in criminal cases.
An acquittal carries a double presumption of innocence, and the appellate court must not disturb findings unless clear error is established.
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony undermine the case against the accused.
The prosecution must establish charges beyond reasonable doubt, especially when witness credibility is in question.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.