Back
A. Y. KOGJE, M. R. MENGDEY
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
BAKULBHAI BACHUBHAI NINAMA – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.Y. KOGJE, J.
1. This Appeal, by the State, is preferred against the acquittal, recorded by the judgment and order dated 11.9.1998 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sabarkantha at Himmatnagar in Sessions Case No. 21 of 1998.
2. By the aforesaid judgment, all the accused, who were charged with the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 504, 451, 302, 323, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act, have been acquitted.
3. When the matter is taken up it is reported that Accused No. 2-Natubhai @ Narsibhai Nemaji, Accused No. 4-Nemaji Harjibhai Ninama, Accused No. 7-Bachubhai Nemaji Ninama and Accused No. 10-Rupsibhai Saluji Ninama have expired pending the Appeal. Hence, the Appeal qua all the aforesaid Accused persons would stand abated.
4. Learned APP Ms. Divyangna Jhala submitted that the Sessions Court has committed an error in not taking into consideration the evidence of the eyewitnesses. Though all the eyewitnesses have given the narration in the manner and method in which the incident took place assaulting the deceased.
5. Learned APP submitted that the medical evidence especially the PM Note would indicate that the cause of death was th
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for reliable evidence in criminal cases, especially in appeals against acquittal.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the significance of motive in a murder case, the burden on the prosecution to establish motive, and the weight of direct evidence in establishin....
The principle of double presumption in favor of the accused in case of acquittal and the need for the prosecution to prove the offence beyond reasonable doubt.
The appellate court upheld the presumption of innocence, emphasizing the need for credible evidence linking the accused to the crime, ultimately dismissing the appeal against acquittal.
The judgment emphasizes the principles regarding the powers of the Appellate Court in dealing with appeals against acquittals, including the double presumption in favor of the accused and the require....
The prosecution must establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt and credibility of eyewitnesses is essential for conviction.
An acquittal carries a double presumption of innocence, and the appellate court must not disturb findings unless clear error is established.
An appellate court must respect the presumption of innocence and can only overturn an acquittal if the trial court's reasoning is perverse or unsupported by the evidence.
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony undermine the case against the accused.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
