Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Dehadrai Seeks Dismissal of Moitra's Dog Custody Suit
11 Mar 2026
Supreme Court Grants Bail to Porsche Father in Swap Case
11 Mar 2026
Natural Gas Supplies Prioritized Under Section 3 Essential Commodities Act Amid LNG Disruptions: Central Govt Order
11 Mar 2026
Delhi High Court Directs Ministries, CBFC to Implement Film Accessibility Features for Disabled Persons per RPWD Act Guidelines
11 Mar 2026
Foreign Nationals Entitled to Article 22(1) Grounds of Arrest in Known Language: Karnataka HC Sets at Liberty but Orders Handover to FRRO
11 Mar 2026
Madras HC Permits CBSE Student to Appear for Maths as Additional Subject Despite Policy Violation in Peculiar 'Rat Race' Circumstances
11 Mar 2026
Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Neha Rathore
11 Mar 2026
Menaka Guruswamy Elected India's First Openly Queer Rajya Sabha MP
11 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
BIREN VAISHNAV
Tata Chemicals Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Soma Bhima – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
1. By way of this Petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the Petitioner has challenged the Award of the Labour Court Jamnagar dated 6.1.2006 passed in Reference (LCJ) No.470 of 1991 granting reinstatement with 50% back-wages to the Respondent Workman.
FACTS:
2. The Petitioner is a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 engaged in the manufacture of soda ash, salt and other chemicals. The Respondent workman was working in the Foundary Department of the Factory of the petitioner.
3. On 18.4.1991 at around 7.15 pm the workman alongwith 2 to 4 other workmen assaulted one Punja Naran with a knife causing him grievous injury. After recording preliminary statements of various persons a charge sheet was issued to the respondent workman on 23.4.1991.
4. Pursuant to the Charge Sheet a departmental inquiry was conducted. In the Departmental Inquiry one D
The burden of proof lies on the employer to establish the voluntary nature of the workman's resignation, and the court emphasized the principles governing the payment of back wages.
The dismissal of workmen based on a domestic enquiry must be justified, and the impact of acquittal in a criminal case on the charges in the domestic enquiry should be considered. Additionally, the a....
Departmental inquiries require a preponderance of probabilities for proof, differing from the strict standards in criminal trials, and insufficient evidence can render dismissal illegal.
The Labour Court must first determine the validity of domestic enquiry before evaluating evidence presented for dismissal in industrial disputes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages is the normal rule in cases of wrongful termination of service, as emphasized in the c....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Labour Court has a duty to grant the employer the opportunity to lead evidence in support of the charges once the domestic inquiry is foun....
The presence of some evidence in a domestic inquiry is sufficient to uphold findings, and the standard of proof is based on preponderance of probabilities, not beyond reasonable doubt.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article