VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
Executive Engineer – Appellant
Versus
Dhirabhai Bhurabhai Pagi Since Decd. Through Shantaben Wd/O Dhirabhai Pagi – Respondent
ORDER :
VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, J.
1. The appellant Nos. 1 and 2, i.e. the original Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, have preferred the present appeal under Clause-15 of the Letters Patent, challenging the oral judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court, Dated: 28.09.2022, in Special Civil Application No. 12082 of 2019, whereby, the learned Single Judge allowed the said petition filed by the present opponent-original petitioner, directing the appellant Nos.1 and 2 to grant pensionary, terminal and other benefits, which had accrued in favour of the late worker, who happened to be the husband of the opponent-wife, i.e. the original petitioner.
2. The brief facts of the case are as under;
The husband of the present opponent-wife was engaged by the appellants as a dailywager with effect from 21.11.1972 and he passed away on 25.07.2003, after rendering the services for about 30 years.
2.1 Therefore, the opponent-wife approached the Labour Court, Godhra, by filing an application, being Recovery Application No. 66 of 2013, under Section 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( ‘Act’, in brief), claiming pensionary benefits.
2.1.1 It appears that the Labour Court dismissed the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.