SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Guj) 669

A. J. DESAI, BIREN VAISHNAV
Jashiben Lallubhai Patel – Appellant
Versus
Competent Authority, Nhai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. A.J. Yagnik.
For the Respondent: Mr. Maulik Nanavati, Mr. Sahil Trivedi.

ORDER :

(Biren Vaishnav, J.)

1. In all these petitions, RULE is made returnable forthwith and with the consent of the learned counsel for the respective parties, the matters are taken up for final hearing.

2. For the averments made in the application, the Civil Application for joining party in Special Civil Application No.26651 of 2022 is hereby allowed.

3. The common issue involved in all these petitions is as to whether the awards passed in the respective petitions need to be modified/amended/revised and the compensation be recomputed and recalculated qua the lands of the petitioners by multiplying the market value as determined under Section 26(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter to be referred to as ‘the Act of 2013’ for short) with Factor-2 as per Section 26(2) and applying all other statutory benefits including solatium under Section 30(1), interest under Section 30(3) of the Act and to determine and pay such compensation with interest as per the award ratio laid down by this Court in Special Civil Application No.8734 of 2019 and other cognate matters decided on 12.09.2019.

4. Since th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top