IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
M.R. MENGDEY, J.
Dinesh S/o Shamjibhai Maheshwari – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat and Others – Respondents
Criminal Misc. Application No. 5576 of 2014
Decided On : 04-08-2023
Section 482 - Quashing of FIR - Amicable Settlement and Dissolution of Marriage
Fact of the Case:
The applicant sought to quash the FIR against them, citing the acquittal of other co-accused and the amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage between the parties.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the matter had been amicably settled between the parties outside the court, the marriage had been dissolved, and the respondent had turned hostile to the case of prosecution.
Issues: The issue was whether the FIR should be quashed in light of the amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage, and the respondent turning hostile to the case of prosecution.
Ratio Decidendi: The court decided to quash the FIR based on the amicable settlement, dissolution of marriage, and the respondent turning hostile to the case of prosecution.
Final Decision: The impugned FIR and all consequential proceedings were quashed and set aside.
JUDGMENT :
M.R. MENGDEY, J.
1. The present application has been filed by the applicant-original accused under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashing and setting aside the impugned FIR being I.C.R. No. 6 of 2014 registered with Mahila Police Station, Gandhidham, Kachchh (East) for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 504, 506(2) and 114 of the Indian Penal Code (herein after referred to as the “IPC”) & Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowary Prohibition Act.
2. Learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that the trial qua other co-accused has culminated into acquittal vide judgment and order dated 06.10.2020 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gandhidham - Kachchh (East) in Criminal Case No. 4377 of 2015. He places on record a copy of the said judgment and order on record along with the deposition of respondent no. 2 recorded in the said criminal case.
2.1 Learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties outside the Court and the marriage between respondent no. 2 and Rajesh Harjibhai Zola has been dissolved. He has also produced on record a copy of affidavit of respondent no. 2 to that effect. He, therefore, submitted to allow present application and quash and set aside the impugned FIR being I.C.R. No. 6 of 2014 registered with Mahila Police Station, Gandhidham, Kachchh (East).
2.2 Learned advocate for the applicant has also produced on record a certified copy of deposition of respondent no. 2 recorded in Criminal Case No. 4377 of 2015 vide Exh.10. In the said deposition, the respondent no. 2 has not supported the case of prosecution and she has declared turned hostile to the case of prosecution. In her deposition, she has stated that the matter has been settled with the accused. It appears that on the basis of the said deposition, the Trial Court, vide judgment and order dated 06.10.2020, passed in Criminal Case No. 4377 of 2015 has ordered to acquit other co-accused persons viz. Kiranbhai Harjibhai Zola, Harjibhai Kayabhai Zola and Jayshreeben Harjibhai Zola.
2.3 Learned advocate for the applicant has submitted a copy of the affidavit affirmed by present respondent no. 2. As per the said affidavit, the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and the marriage between her and her husband has been dissolved.
3. Learned APP opposes to grant of present application.
4. None appears for the respondent no. 2-original complainant.
5. Heard learned advocates for the parties and perused the material on record. Considering the fact that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties outside the Court and the marriage between respondent no. 2 and Rajesh Harjibhai Zola has been dissolved and affidavit to that effect has been filed by the respondent no. 2 and also considering the deposition of respondent no. 2 recorded in Criminal Case No. 4377 of 2015 vide Exh.10 in which she has turned hostile to the case of prosecution and in her deposition, she has stated that the matter has been settled with the accused and on the basis of the said deposition, the Trial Court, vide judgment and order dated 06.10.2020, passed in Criminal Case No. 4377 of 2015 has ordered to acquit other co-accused persons viz. Kiranbhai Harjibhai Zola, Harjibhai Kayabhai Zola and Jayshreeben Harjibhai Zola, there is no point to continue with the present FIR and therefore, impugned FIR being I.C.R. No. 6 of 2014 registered with Mahila Police Station, Gandhidham, Kachchh (East) for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 504, 506(2) and 114 of the Indian Penal Code & Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowary Prohibition Act as well as all other consequential proceedings arising out of the aforesaid F.I.R. are hereby quashed and set aside.
6. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.
7. Direct service permitted.
The court has the power to quash an FIR if the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and there is no point to continue with the proceedings.
Matrimonial disputes should be put to quietus if the parties have arrived upon a genuine settlement, as established in B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana, (2003)4 SCC 675; K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa, ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to quash non-compoundable offences under section 482 of the Code, considering the nature of the offence and the amicable sett....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that an amicable settlement between the parties, coupled with the absence of objection from the State, can be grounds for quashing an FIR.
The court can quash non-compoundable offences based on amicable settlements and exercise inherent powers under section 482 of the Code to prevent abuse of the court process.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that in cases of amicable settlement, continuation of criminal proceedings may amount to an abuse of process of law and Court, and the court may....
The court can exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to quash criminal proceedings if it deems it necessary to secure the ends of justice, especially i....
The court emphasized the power to quash FIRs in matrimonial disputes when parties reach an amicable settlement, prioritizing justice and resolution over prosecution.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.