SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Guj) 724

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
M.R. MENGDEY, J.
Dinesh S/o Shamjibhai Maheshwari – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat and Others – Respondents
Criminal Misc. Application No. 5576 of 2014
Decided On : 04-08-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Nayan Gupta, Ashish M. Dagli.
For the Respondent: Vrunda Shah.

The court has the power to quash an FIR if the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and there is no point to continue with the proceedings.

Headnote:

Section 482 - Quashing of FIR - Amicable Settlement and Dissolution of Marriage

Fact of the Case:

The applicant sought to quash the FIR against them, citing the acquittal of other co-accused and the amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage between the parties.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the matter had been amicably settled between the parties outside the court, the marriage had been dissolved, and the respondent had turned hostile to the case of prosecution.

Issues: The issue was whether the FIR should be quashed in light of the amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage, and the respondent turning hostile to the case of prosecution.

Ratio Decidendi: The court decided to quash the FIR based on the amicable settlement, dissolution of marriage, and the respondent turning hostile to the case of prosecution.

Final Decision: The impugned FIR and all consequential proceedings were quashed and set aside.

JUDGMENT :

M.R. MENGDEY, J.

1. The present application has been filed by the applicant-original accused under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashing and setting aside the impugned FIR being I.C.R. No. 6 of 2014 registered with Mahila Police Station, Gandhidham, Kachchh (East) for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 504, 506(2) and 114 of the Indian Penal Code (herein after referred to as the “IPC”) & Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowary Prohibition Act.

2. Learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that the trial qua other co-accused has culminated into acquittal vide judgment and order dated 06.10.2020 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gandhidham - Kachchh (East) in Criminal Case No. 4377 of 2015. He places on record a copy of the said judgment and order on record along with the deposition of respondent no. 2 recorded in the said criminal case.

2.1 Learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties outside the Court and the marriage between respondent no. 2 and Rajesh Harjibhai Zola has been dissolved. He has also produced on record a copy of affidavit of respondent no. 2 to that effect. He, therefore, submitted to allow present application and quash and set aside the impugned FIR being I.C.R. No. 6 of 2014 registered with Mahila Police Station, Gandhidham, Kachchh (East).

2.2 Learned advocate for the applicant has also produced on record a certified copy of deposition of respondent no. 2 recorded in Criminal Case No. 4377 of 2015 vide Exh.10. In the said deposition, the respondent no. 2 has not supported the case of prosecution and she has declared turned hostile to the case of prosecution. In her deposition, she has stated that the matter has been settled with the accused. It appears that on the basis of the said deposition, the Trial Court, vide judgment and order dated 06.10.2020, passed in Criminal Case No. 4377 of 2015 has ordered to acquit other co-accused persons viz. Kiranbhai Harjibhai Zola, Harjibhai Kayabhai Zola and Jayshreeben Harjibhai Zola.

2.3 Learned advocate for the applicant has submitted a copy of the affidavit affirmed by present respondent no. 2. As per the said affidavit, the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and the marriage between her and her husband has been dissolved.

3. Learned APP opposes to grant of present application.

4. None appears for the respondent no. 2-original complainant.

5. Heard learned advocates for the parties and perused the material on record. Considering the fact that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties outside the Court and the marriage between respondent no. 2 and Rajesh Harjibhai Zola has been dissolved and affidavit to that effect has been filed by the respondent no. 2 and also considering the deposition of respondent no. 2 recorded in Criminal Case No. 4377 of 2015 vide Exh.10 in which she has turned hostile to the case of prosecution and in her deposition, she has stated that the matter has been settled with the accused and on the basis of the said deposition, the Trial Court, vide judgment and order dated 06.10.2020, passed in Criminal Case No. 4377 of 2015 has ordered to acquit other co-accused persons viz. Kiranbhai Harjibhai Zola, Harjibhai Kayabhai Zola and Jayshreeben Harjibhai Zola, there is no point to continue with the present FIR and therefore, impugned FIR being I.C.R. No. 6 of 2014 registered with Mahila Police Station, Gandhidham, Kachchh (East) for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 504, 506(2) and 114 of the Indian Penal Code & Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowary Prohibition Act as well as all other consequential proceedings arising out of the aforesaid F.I.R. are hereby quashed and set aside.

6. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.

7. Direct service permitted.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top