SANDEEP N. BHATT
Gulammiya @ Marshall Noormahommad Nandoliya – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned APP waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent No.1 – State.
2. The present application is filed for seeking following reliefs:
(B) During pendency and final disposal of the present application, YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to stay further investigation and proceedings of F.I.R C.RI No. 10 of 2018 Chapi Police Station (at ANNEXURE-A hereto);
(C) Such other and further relief's, as are deemed fit, in the facts and circumstances of this case make kindly be granted.”
3.1 Brief facts as per the case of the applicant in this application are as such that on 30/3/2018 the complainant had travelled from Siddhpur, District Patan to village:- Meta for settling the case which was filed earlier by the complainant wherein, it is reflected from the compliant that the applicant No.1 had informed him to come at hotel Taj as there is a crowd in village and therefore settlement talks would not be possible. Thereafter it is alleged that the applicants along with some unknown
Dharmendrabhai Nandubhai Patel Vs. State of Gujarat
Himatsing Shivsing v. The State of Gujarat
Hitesh Verma Vs. State of Uttarakhand & Anr.
Swaran Singh & Ors. Vs. State, Through Standing Counsel & Ors.
State of Haryana V/s Bhajan Lal reported in AIR 1992 SC 604
State of Haryana V/s Bhajan Lal reported in AIR 1992 SC 604
Swaran Singh & Ors. Vs. State, Through Standing Counsel & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.