SANDEEP N. BHATT
Manojkumar Ramnikbhai Rojivadiya (Patel) – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. All these applications are filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (`the Code’ for short) for quashing and setting aside the complaints being Criminal Case Nos.2615 of 2016, 2621 of 2016, 2614 of 2016, 2611 of 2016, 2613 of 2016, 2622 of 2016 and 2618 of 2016 respectively filed under the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act (`NI Act’ for short).
2. As the common question of facts and law are involved in all these applications, at the request of learned advocates for the parties, they are heard together and disposed of by this common oral judgment.
3. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned APP Mr.Joshi waives service of notice of rule for respondent no.1-state and learned advocate Mr.Vimal Purohit waives service of notice of rule for respondent no.2.
4. For the sake of convenience, the facts of Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.15360 of 2019 are considered, which are as under:
4.1. A company namely Yogi Hi-Tech Private Limited was incorporated in the year 1995, which was engaged in the business of manufacturing, developing, importing, exporting, trading, distributing etc. All kinds of bearings, tapper rollers etc. And other required materials
Aneeta Hada V/s Godfather Travels & Tours Pvt. Ltd.
Gunmala Sales Private Ltd. V/s Anu Mehta & Ors.
Inder Mohan Goswami and Another versus State of Uttaranchal reported in (2007) 12 SCC 1
S.P.Mani and Mohan Dairy V/s Dr.Snehalatha Elangovan reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 1238
Harshendra Kumar D. v. Rebatilata Koley Etc.
Khadkiwala V/s State (Government of NCT of Delhi) and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.