SANDEEP N. BHATT
Manishkumar Ramvilas Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANDEEP N. BHATT, J.
1. All these applications are filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘the Code’ for short) for quashing and setting aside the complaints being Criminal Case Nos. 33269, 33268, 33253, 33262, 33263, 33264, 33265, 33252, 33266, 33267, 35578, 35579, 33271 and 33270 of 2013 respectively filed under the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act (‘NI Act’ for short).
2. As the common question of facts and law are involved in all these applications, at the request of learned advocates for the parties, they are heard together and disposed of by this common oral judgment.
3. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned APP waives service of notice of rule for respondent no. 1-state and learned advocate Ms. Minoo Shah waives service of notice of rule for respondent no. 2.
4. For the sake of convenience, the facts of Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 17940 of 2018 are considered, which are as under:
Anand Kumar Mohatta and Another vs. State (NCT of Delhi), Department of Home and Another
Gunmala Sales Pvt. Ltd. vs. Anu Mehta and Others
Inder Mohan Goswami and Another vs. State of Uttaranchal
National Small Industries Corporation Ltd vs. Harmeet Singh Paintal
SMS Pharmaceutical Ltd. vs. Neeta Bhalla and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.