IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
RAJENDRA M. SAREEN, J.
Niranjana R. Patel - Petitioner
Versus
State of Gujarat & Others - Respondents
R/Special Civil Application No. 1081 of 2008
Decided On : 19-07-2023
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Gujarat Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 2002 - Rule 25, 36 and 48 to 50 - Voluntarily retired - Grant pensionary and retirement benefits - Direct respondent and respondent No.2 to accept representation and treat petitioner as having been “voluntarily retired” and grant petitioner all consequential benefits including pensionary benefits and other retirement benefits – Held, When application made by petitioner after continuous service of 20 years for voluntary retirement and issued notice for voluntary retirement for 3 months to appointing authority and appointing authority has not refused to grant permission for retirement before expiry of said notice period as per Proviso (2) of Rule 48, voluntary retirement has become effective from date of expiry of notice period and on expiry notice period, petitioner would stand retired voluntarily - Impugned order passed by Director of Technical Education is hereby quashed and set aside - Petition is allowed.
JUDGMENT :
1. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following main relief :
2. FACTS OF THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER:
2.1. The petitioner was appointed as Tracer in the office of the Executive Engineer, Drainage Division, Surat w.e.f. 02/01/1978 and again she was appointed at Technical Assistant in the same office, Canal Division Surat w.e.f. 21/3/1980. Thereafter, the petitioner was appointed as Lecturer in the department of Architecture, Govt. Polytechnic College for Girls, Surat – respondent No.2 on 01/01/1982 and thus, the service of the petitioner as a Lecturer commenced from 01/01/1982.
2.2. The petitioner went on leave from 19/5/1994 to 25/08/1994 for the purpose of visiting abroad – Canada to see her sister. This was first visit of the petitioner to foreign country and she resumed her duty in time i.e. on 26/08/1994 after returning from abroad.
2.3. The petitioner again went on leave from 01/02/2001 to 19/04/2001 for the purpose of going abroad and resumed duty in time on 20/04/2001.
2.4. It is the case of the petitioner that since her sister living in Canada was not keeping well, the petitioner again was required to go to Canada to see her sister and for that purpose, the petitioner made declaration along with an application for obtaining No Objection Certificate for the purpose of leave in her college stating that the petitioner was supposed to go abroad and in the event if the petitioner fails to resume duties as Lecturer in the Department of Architecture, immediately after the expiry of the period of leave, that might be granted to the petitioner, as per the declaration, that may be considered as resignation of the petitioner from service of Govt. of Gujarat, and in that case, the Government may proceed further as if, the petitioner has resigned from service of the Government.
2.5. On 17/2/2003, the petitioner again made an application along with separate reminder for obtaining No Objection Certificate for the purpose of going abroad. Thereafter, again the petitioner appraised the Principal Govt. Polytechnic College Surat about her tour to Canada to begin on 08/06/2003, anticipating receipt of No Objection Certificate.
2.6. It is the case of the petitioner that after reaching Canada, the petitioner’s health deteriorated and she sustained severe back pain on account of sciatica. Therefore, the petitioner immediately informed the Principal, Govt. Polytechnic College, Surat – respondent No.2 with respect to her ill-health by correspondence dated 07/09/2003. In response to that the petitioner received communication dated 25/09/2003 from the Principal, Govt. Polytechnic College, Surat – respondent No.2 informing that prior applications of the petitioner for obtaining No Objection Certificate was granted and her leave was sanctioned upto 15/09/2003 and it was stated that the students were suffering a lot on account of absence of the petitioner - Lecturer and the petitioner was asked to resume forthwith.
2.7. The petitioner, therefore, again informed the respondent No.2 expressing regret about her difficulties being faced by the students and staff member
Ms. J.K. Cotton Spg. & Wvg. Mills Company Ltd., Kanpur Vs. State of U.P. and others
Babubhai C. Zaveri Vs. District Health Officer Jilla Panchayat, Surat
Yogesh Shivabhai Patel Vs. State of Gujarat & Ors.
Surya Kant Chimanlal Patel Vs. State of Gujarat
Mansukh A. Doshi Vs. State of Gujarat
Prithvirajsingh Vs. State of Gujarat and Anr.
An employee's application for voluntary retirement is effective if not refused, and resignation cannot be accepted retroactively without following proper procedures.
An employee has the right to withdraw the proposal for voluntary retirement before the jural relationship of employee and employer comes to an end.
An employee's request for voluntary retirement can be withdrawn before it takes effect, and the intention behind the request must be considered in determining its nature.
An employee cannot withdraw his resignation after it has been accepted by the employer.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the respondent No.4 is entitled to pension benefits as her application for voluntary retirement ought to have been accepted in the year 2003 i....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.