Kerala HC Issues Notice to Digi Yatra Foundation in PIL Seeking Strict Compliance with DPDP Act 2023 for Airport Passenger Data: High Court of Kerala
07 Mar 2026
Appointment to Higher Post on Compassionate Grounds Not a Matter of Right: J&K&L High Court
07 Mar 2026
Nearly Decade-Long Delay in Patnitop Illegal Construction PIL Appalls J&K&L High Court; Directs PDA CEO to Join Proceedings
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Employees Under CCS Pension Rules Excluded from PG Act Section 2(e) Gratuity: Delhi HC Upholds Forfeiture on Resignation
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
CJI Kant: Action Needed for More Women Judges
10 Mar 2026
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, C. KUMARAPPAN
N. Santhosh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Bar Council of Tamil Nadu & Puducherry, Rep. by its Secretary – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
ORDER :
[Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.]
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to consider petitioner's application for enrolment dated 05.04.2022 and pass an order permitting the petitioner to enroll as an advocate.
The writ of Mandamus has been instituted to direct the respondent to consider the application submitted by the writ petitioner for enrolment and permitting him to enroll as an Advocate in the State roll.
2. Ms.Selvi George, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner would contend that there is no express bar under Section 24 of The Advocates Act, 1961. In the absence of an express bar under the provisions of the Advocates Act, the right of enrollment of the petitioner cannot be denied by the respondent Bar Council of Tamil Nadu. Section 24A of the Advocates Act stipulates disqualification for enrollment. Mere registering of an FIR or pendency of a criminal case therefore, cannot be a bar for enrolling a candiate under the Provisions o
The court affirmed that pending criminal cases can disqualify candidates from enrollment as advocates, emphasizing the need for integrity in the legal profession.
The right to practice law must adhere to explicit legislative provisions, where judicial directives cannot impose additional disqualifications beyond those established in statutes.
The pendency of a criminal case against an applicant serves as a bar to enrollment as an advocate before the Bar Council.
Full disclosure of criminal involvement is essential for enrollment as an Advocate, and failure to disclose such information can lead to dismissal of the application.
The eligibility for enrollment as an advocate under the Advocates Act is contingent upon compliance with specific disqualifications, particularly concerning concurrent employment in government servic....
A writ of mandamus is not maintainable when the matter has already been adjudicated by the appropriate authority.
The Bar Council of India has the authority to adjudicate disputes regarding the enrolment of advocates, and the court will not intervene in disputed factual matters pending before it.
The misuse of the advocate emblem by an individual not duly enrolled as an advocate constitutes a violation of legal provisions, warranting investigation and action by relevant authorities.
The court established that compliance with educational qualifications as per the Bar Council of India and UGC regulations is mandatory for enrollment in the Bar, and candidates have the right to appe....
S.M.Anantha Murugan Vs. The Chairman and others reported in (2015) 6 CTC 22
-
Read summary
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.