Back
SANDEEP N. BHATT
Gujarat Sidhee Cement Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Legal Heirs of Lakha Bijal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. amendment and challenge of orders. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding trial court errors. (Para 6) |
| 3. limitations on provisions application. (Para 7 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. court’s limited jurisdiction and dismissal of petitions. (Para 18) |
| 5. court orders for expedited resolution. (Para 19 , 20) |
JUDGMENT :
SANDEEP N. BHATT, J.
1. Draft amendment dated 17.4.2023 is allowed. The same shall be carried out forthwith. By way of these petitions, the petitioners seek to challenge the impugned orders passed below application filed under Order 23 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (‘CPC’ for short) by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Veraval in respective Land Reference Cases.
2. At the joint request of learned advocates for the parties, all these petitions are being disposed of finally by this common oral judgment, as identical question of law and facts are involved in all these petitions.
3. Rule. Respective learned advocates waive service of notice of rule in respective petitions.
4. For the sake of convenience, the facts of Special Civil Application No. 1308 of 2023 are referred to, which are as under:
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
