SANGEETA K. VISHEN
Rajkot Municipal Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Jay Hind Project Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. With the consent of the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties, the captioned writ petition is taken up for final disposal.
2. Issue rule, returnable forthwith. Mr Mitul K. Shelat, learned advocate for Ms Disha N. Nanavati, learned advocate waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent.
3. By this petition, Rajkot Municipal Corporation, that is, the petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the ‘petitioner Corporation’), inter alia, has prayed for passing of the appropriate orders directing the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Rajkot to hear Civil Miscellaneous Application no.47 of 2015 within a stipulated time limit and meanwhile to pass appropriate orders staying the implementation, execution and operation of the award dated 02.12.2014 passed by the learned Sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Reference case no.3 of 2013. Petitioner Corporation, has also prayed for direction to the learned Principal District Judge, Rajkot to hear Commercial Execution no.381 of 2021 preferred by M/s. Jay Hind Project Ltd., that is, the respondent (hereinafter referred to as ‘the respondent’) coupled with the further direction not to pass any order of disbursemen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.