J. C. DOSHI
VIDHYABEN MUKESHBHAI NAYI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule for Respondent No. 1-State and learned Advocate, Mr. Dave, waives for Respondent No. 2-original accused.
1. By way of this application, filed under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in brief, ‘the Code’), the applicant-first informant seeks to assail the order dated 26.06.2023, passed in Cr. M.A. No. 855 of 2023, by the learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Gandhinagar, granting anticipatory bail to the respondent-original accused No. 1 in connection with the offence registered with the Chandkheda Police Station, District Ahmedabad City, being CR No. 11191008230406 of 2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 294(b), 506(1) and 114 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (in brief the ‘Act of 1989’).
2. Learned Advocate for the applicant would submit that learned trial Court has not taken into consideration the offence under the provisions of the Act of 1989, while granting bail to the respondent-accused. He would further submit that the trial Court granted bail, only on the ground that Respondent No.
Abdul Basit alias Raju and Others vs. Mohd. Abdul Kadir Cahudhary and Another
Dolat Ram and Others vs. State of Haryana
Gurcharan Singh and Others vs. State (Delhi Administration)
Kekhriesatuo Tep and Others vs. National Investigating Agency
Prathvi Raj Chauhan vs. Union of India and Others
Puran vs. Rambilas and Another
Ranjit Singh vs. State of M.P. (2013) 16 SCC 797
Shakuntla Devi vs. Baljinder Singh
Vilas Pandurang Pawar and Another vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.