IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
DIVYESH A. JOSHI, J.
Rakeshkumar S/o Lankeshkumar Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat and Another – Respondents
Criminal Misc. Application No. 511 of 2024
Decided On : 11-03-2024
NDPS Act - Regular Bail - Section 8(C), 20(b)(ii)(c), 29 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which makes offences under the Act cognizable and non-bailable, especially for offences involving commercial quantity. The court highlighted the conditions for granting bail under Section 37, emphasizing the need for the Public Prosecutor's opposition and the court's satisfaction based on reasonable grounds of the accused's innocence and likelihood to not commit a similar offence while on bail. The court also referred to relevant case laws interpreting the term 'reasonable grounds' and prescribing stringent parameters for granting bail under the NDPS Act.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved an application for regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in connection with an FIR registered under Sections 8(C), 20(b)(ii)(c), and 29 of the NDPS Act. The accused was caught red-handed with 83 kg of Ganja and was charged for his role in a larger drug trafficking operation.
Finding of the Court:
The court rejected the bail application, emphasizing the gravity of the offence, the accused's role in the drug trafficking, and the legislative intent behind Section 37 of the NDPS Act. The court considered the accused's potential impact on the youth of the nation and the possibility of fleeing from the trial, leading to the rejection of the bail application.
Issues: The main issue was whether discretion should be exercised in favor of the applicant for granting bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, considering the gravity of the offence and the accused's role in the drug trafficking operation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, the legislative intent behind the provision, and the stringent parameters for granting bail under the Act. The court emphasized the need for reasonable grounds to believe in the accused's innocence and likelihood to not commit a similar offence while on bail.
Final Decision: The court rejected the bail application and discharged the rule, citing the gravity of the offence, the accused's role in the drug trafficking, and the potential impact on the society, especially the youth.
JUDGMENT :
DIVYESH A. JOSHI, J.
1. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned APP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent-State.
2. The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for regular bail in connection with the FIR being C.R. No. NCB/AZU/C.R. No. 03 of 2019 registered with the NCB Police Station, Ahmedabad of the offence punishable under Sections 8(C), 20(b)(ii)(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act.
3. A quick glance at the FIR reveals the following:
3.2 The said secret information was then reduced into writing and forwarded to the Superintendent of NCB, Ahmedabad on the very same day which was acknowledged by Shri Harish Kumar, Superintendent, NCB, Ahmedabad who then instructed Shri Rahul Tomar, Intelligence Officer to form a team and take appropriate action in accordance with law.
3.3 Accordingly, on 27.04.2019, the Intelligence Officer Shri Rahul Tomar along with the other fellow officers reached at the Surat railway station where two Panchas were also called for and got acquainted with the secret information by the intelligence officer. The police personnel also introduced themselves to the Panchas. Thereafter, necessary procedure of raid also came to be followed.
3.4 Thereafter, on 27.04.2019, at around 3:40 hours, Puri-Ahmedabad express arrived at the Surat railway station and stayed for some time. During that period, the officers of the NCB along with the RPF and Panchas entered into the Coach No. B-5 and reached at berth Nos. 5, 6 and 7 where they found three persons sitting over there. Thereafter, the Intelligence Officer Shri Rahul Tomar introduced himself to those persons and asked about their identities, whereupon, they identified themselves as Karpur Sahu, Rakesh Sahu and Ajir Kumar Sahu which were matching with the names given in the secret information.
3.5 Thereafter, all the accused got acquainted with the secret information that they are indulged in the illegal trafficking of narcotic substance Ganja and are having 80 kg Ganja with them. Thereafter, they were asked to show their bags and upon search being carried out of all the bags, total 83 kg Ganja was recovered by the police. Hence, FIR came to be lodged against all the accused persons.
4. Learned advocate Mr. Kishan Daiya appearing for the applicant has submitted that the applicant-accused was arrested on 27.04.2019 and since then he is in jail, i.e. for more than three and half years. Learned advocate Mr. Daiya has also submitted that the investigation has already been completed and charge-sheet has also been filed. It is moreso submitted that in the charge-sheet papers, number of witnesses have been cited by the investigator, out of which, only nine witnesses have been examined so far which is indicative of the fact that the trial would take considerable long period of time to conclude and the applicant-accused has already spent more than three and half years in jail. Learned advocate Mr. Daiya has also submitted that the statement of the applicant-accused under Section 67 of the NDPS Act also came to be recorded by the investigator wherein he has stated that one Mitu introduced him to the other co-accused and handed over the narcotic substance Ganja for delivering it to the person at Bharuch for which he was supposed to get a very meager amount of Rs. 5,000/-. It is submitted that the applicant-accu
Durand Didier vs. Chief Secretary, Union Territory of Goa
The court denied bail under the NDPS Act due to the serious nature of drug trafficking charges and failure to meet statutory conditions, emphasizing public safety and legislative intent.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the stringent conditions for granting bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, especially for offences involving commercial quantity of contraband su....
The court ruled that bail under the NDPS Act requires clear evidence of innocence and no likelihood of reoffending, emphasizing the serious nature of drug trafficking.
The judgment establishes the stringent parameters for granting bail under the NDPS Act, emphasizing the need to satisfy reasonable grounds for believing in the innocence of the accused and ensuring t....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the stringent parameters for granting bail under the NDPS Act, as prescribed by Section 37, and the court's need to be satisfied on reasonable grou....
The court emphasized that bail for drug offenses requires proof of innocence and likelihood of non-reoffending, in line with stringent statutory provisions to combat drug trafficking.
The court held that bail cannot be granted under the NDPS Act without satisfying the statutory requirements of demonstrating that the accused is not guilty of the offence and is unlikely to commit fu....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.