IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Divyesh A. Joshi, J.
Jatin @ Jaggu S/o Girishbhai Bhagat – Applicant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
R/Criminal Misc. Application (For Regular Bail - After Chargesheet) No. 5367 of 2024
Decided On : 19-04-2024
JUDGMENT :
1. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned APP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent-State.
2. The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for regular bail in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.11210050231274 of 2023 registered with the Rander Police Station, Surat of the offence punishable under Sections 8(c), 20(B)(ii)(C) and 29 of the NDPS Act.
3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, may be summarized as under;
3.1 On 22.09.2023, the complainant Shri Samatsinh Narsinh, Head Constable, Buckle No.3027, S.O.G., Surat City has filed the present complaint stating that while he was present at the Sagrampura SOG Field Office, at that time, Head Constable Yogeshbhai Kansarabhai, Buckle No.3152, informed them about the tip-off received by him that one Jatin @ Jaggu Girishbhai Bhagat, a resident of Rander Surat, has brought the cache of hashish (Charas) from somewhere and has been indulged in trafficking of the same and even today, at around 4:00 to 5:00 O’clock in the afternoon, he will go to Kirtinagar by passing through the Laxmi Dairy street situated opposite Roopali Cinema, Rander-Palanpur Patiya Road carrying one yellow bag, which information was then reduced into writing and handed over to the concerned superior officer who, in turn, forwarded the same to the Police Commissioner Rajdipsinh. After that, as the raid had to be carried out at such place, Panchas were also called for.
3.2 Thereafter, after following all necessary procedure of raid and drawing panchnamas, all the members of the raiding party reached at the pointed place at around 16:00 hours and scattered at different places of the street in a way that they can keep a watch of the movement of the people coming from both the sides of the street by disguising themselves.
3.3 Thereafter, after 45 minutes, the person as described in the secret information, was seen passing through the said street carrying the yellow bag, who was cordoned by the police at 16:56 hours near Sejal Complex and then arrested. After that, the superior officer introduced himself to the said person, and upon asking his identity, he identified himself as Jaggu S/o Girishbhai Bhagat, aged about 26, a resident of Rander, Surat. Thereafter, as it was difficult to go ahead with the further procedure at such a public place, the said person was taken to the office situated in the parking of the ‘D’ Block of Sejal Complex where the further procedure was being carried out.
3.4 Thereafter, the said person got acquainted about the secret information. After that, requisite procedure under Sections 43 and 50 of the NDPS Act was also followed. Personal search of the accused person was also made, however, nothing objectionable was found upon his personal search. After that, the yellow coloured bag which the accused was carrying was also being searched from where two red coloured plastic pouches were found. When both the pouches were slightly opened from the corner side in the presence of the Panchas, a suspicious brown coloured solid substance was found to be there in both the pouches having pungent smell. Thereafter, when the accused was asked about the said suspicious narcotic substance, he admitted it to be the contraband substance hashish (Charas).
3.5 Thereafter, samples were taken and the officers of the FSL were also called for and upon testing with the drug detection kit, the samples tested positive for cannabis (Charas). When such contraband substance Charas recovered from the accused was weighed with the weighing scale, the same was found to be 2 KG and 173 Grams. Hence, the present FIR.
4. Learned advocate Mr. Ankit Shah appearing for the applicant has submitted that the so-called incident has occurred in the evening of 22.09.2023, for which, FIR has been lodged on the very same day i.e. on 22.09.2023 and in connection with the same, the applicant has been arrested on 22.09.2023 and since then, he is in judicial custody
Durand Didier v. Chief Secy., Union Territory of Goa
The court ruled that bail under the NDPS Act requires clear evidence of innocence and no likelihood of reoffending, emphasizing the serious nature of drug trafficking.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the stringent conditions for granting bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, especially for offences involving commercial quantity of contraband su....
The judgment establishes the stringent parameters for granting bail under the NDPS Act, emphasizing the need to satisfy reasonable grounds for believing in the innocence of the accused and ensuring t....
The court denied bail under the NDPS Act due to the serious nature of drug trafficking charges and failure to meet statutory conditions, emphasizing public safety and legislative intent.
Bail denied in NDPS commercial quantity case as accused failed twin conditions of Section 37: no reasonable grounds to believe not guilty given prima facie conscious possession via concealment attemp....
Bail denied in NDPS commercial quantity case as vehicle owner prima facie in conscious possession of concealed charas absent explanation; twin conditions of Section 37 not satisfied – reasonable grou....
Bail in NDPS commercial quantity cases denied unless twin conditions under Section 37 satisfied: reasonable grounds accused not guilty and unlikely to reoffend; negation of bail is rule, grant except....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.