Back
S. V. PINTO
Pragjibhai Kadabhai Makwana – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of conviction dated 10.05.2006 passed by the learned Special ACB Judge (Fast Track Court No.3), Jamnagar (herein after referred to as 'the learned trial Court') in Special (ACB) Case No. 08 of 1997, whereby, the learned trial Court has convicted the appellant for the offences punishable under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as “the PC Act.”). The learned trial Court has sentenced the appellant to rigorous imprisonment of one year and fine of Rs.1000/- and in default simple imprisonment for one month for the offence punishable under Section 7 of the PC Act and rigorous imprisonment for two years and fine of Rs.1000/- and in default simple imprisonment for two months for the offence punishable under Sections 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the PC Act. The learned trial Court was further pleased to order that sentences of the appellant to run concurrently. The appellant is hereinafter referred to as ‘the accused’ and he stood in the original case, for the sake of convenience, clar
The prosecution must prove the demand and acceptance of illegal gratification beyond reasonable doubt to establish the guilt of the accused under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
The prosecution must prove demand and acceptance of illegal gratification beyond reasonable doubt for a conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
The prosecution must prove the demand and acceptance of illegal gratification beyond reasonable doubt to establish the guilt of the accused under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
The prosecution must prove the demand and acceptance of illegal gratification beyond reasonable doubt to establish the guilt of the accused under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Proof of demand and acceptance of illegal gratification is essential to establish guilt under the Prevention of Corruption Act, and without clear, cogent, and reliable evidence of demand, no convicti....
Proof of demand and acceptance of illegal gratification beyond reasonable doubt is essential for conviction under the P.C.Act.
The prosecution must prove demand and acceptance as crucial elements for the offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act, and the requirement of valid sanction for prosecution is essential. Lack o....
The demand for illegal gratification is a prerequisite for conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, and the prosecution must prove it beyond reasonable doubt.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
