Back
BHARGAV D. KARIA, NIRAL R. MEHTA
Reliance Industries Limited – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial hearings and consent to proceed. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. challenge to revocation of anti-dumping duties. (Para 4 , 5 , 20) |
| 3. legal arguments against the revocation process. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 4. petitioners sought judicial intervention to quash the revocation. (Para 26) |
| 5. public interest considerations in anti-dumping policies. (Para 58 , 61 , 62 , 72) |
| 6. final directive following the review process. (Para 87 , 90 , 92 , 93) |
JUDGMENT :
Bhargav D. Karia, J.
1. Heard learned Senior Advocate Mr. Mihir Joshi assisted by learned advocate Ms. Gargi Vyas for the petitioners and respondents Nos.1 to 3 in Civil Application No.1 of 2020 and learned advocate Mr. Paresh Dave for the respondent No.6 and the applicant in Civil Application No.1 of 2020 as well as learned advocate Mr. Harsheel Shukla for the respondent No.1.
2. Having regard to the controversy involved in this petition, with the consent of the learned advocates for the respective parties, the petition is taken up for final hearing.
3. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned advocates Mr. Paresh Dave and Mr. Harsheel D. Shukla waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respective respondents.
4.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
