J. C. DOSHI
Bhupeshkumar Jayantilal Prajapati – Appellant
Versus
Runali Bhupeshkumar Prajapati – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. By way of present Revision Application under section 397 read with section 401 of Cr.P.C., the applicants challenge the order dated 22.06.2022 passed by learned JMFC, Vadodara in Criminal Misc. Application No.4100 of 2018, whereby, under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (in short ‘the Act’), learned JMFC granted several reliefs under sections 19(f) and 22 of the Act in an application under section 12 of the Act. Relief granted by the learned JMFC is in tune of Rs.2000/- under section 19(f) of the Act towards rent in-lieu of accommodation and further granted Rs.5,000/- towards maintenance to wife and did not decide to grant relief to minor child as minor child was getting Rs.3000/- from the order of learned Family Court but directed to pay educational expenses of minor son and in addition thereto, also ordered to pay Rs.10,000/- as compensation under section 22 of the Act. The applicant – husband challenged the said order before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Vadodara by filing Criminal Appeal No.217 of 2022. Learned Additional Sessions Judge by order dated 28.11.2023 dismissed the appeal upholding the judgment and order delivered by the lear
Amit Kapoor v/s. Ramesh Chander (2012) 9 SCC 460].
Bhikhabhai Ranchhodbhai Makwana v/s. State of Gujarat [2001 Cr.L.J. 4457
Johar v/s. Mangal Prasad [2008 (3) SCC 423]
Kantilal Chavda v/s. Nanubhai Chavda reported in 1992 (2) GLR 1520
Ramaben Patel v/s. State of Gujarat reported in 1992 (2) GLR 1530.
State of Maharashtra v/s. Jagmohan Singh Kuldip Singh Anand (2004) 7 SCC 659
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.