SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Guj) 584

DEVAN M. DESAI
Arvindbhai Keshavbhai Suthar – Appellant
Versus
G. N. Avasthi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ms Devanshi Patel For Mr Jigar P Raval
For the Defendant : Mr Rituraj M Meena

ORDER :

1. The present First Appeal is filed by the appellant under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).

2. Heard learned advocate Ms. Devanshi K. Patel for learned advocate Mr. Jigar P. Raval for appellant and learned advocate Mr. Rituraj M. Meena for the respondent No.2. Though served, none appeared for respondent No.1.

3. The plaintiff-appellant filed Civil Suit No.708 of 1988 before the City Civil and Sessions Court, Ahmedabad for a relief of damages of Rs.2,70,000/- from the respondents-defendants. The learned City Civil and Sessions Court, Ahmedabad dismissed the suit vide judgment and decree dated 31.01.2003.

3.1. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and decree, the present appellant is before this Court.

4. The brief facts of the case are as under:-

4.1 The plaintiff was an employee of defendant No.2. As plaintiff suffered some eye problem in the month of August, 1986, plaintiff approached defendant No.1, who is working as a Senior Medical Officer in the dispensary run by defendant No.2. On consultation, defendant No.1 prescribed “Zinco-Sulpha” (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the eye drops’) to the plaint

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top