NIRZAR S. DESAI, HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Himatlal Bhailal Rajgor – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant seeks to overturn acquittal. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. prosecution alleges counterfeit recovery. (Para 3 , 4 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. witnesses turned hostile, undermining prosecution. (Para 11 , 12 , 16) |
| 4. mens rea is essential for ipc charges. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. trial court's acquittal upheld by this court. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
JUDGMENT :
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.
1. By way of present acquittal appeal, the appellant-State, under Section 378 of the CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE , 1973, has assailed the judgment and order of acquittal dated 09.01.1998, recorded by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kutch-Bhuj in Sessions Case No. 80 of 1992 wherein the learned Judge has acquitting the accused for the offences punishable under Sections 489(A), (B), (C) and (D), 34, 171 read with Section 114 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE .
2. During the pendency of the appeal, accused Nos. 2 and 3 expired. Hence, the appeal stands disposed of as abated qua the accused Nos. 2 and 3.
3. It is the case of the prosecution that on June 8, 1992, at around 8:30 a.m, an intelligence report was received by PSI, Mr. R.G. Rathod of Kutch-Bhuj, that accused No. 1 had fake US Dollar and Indian Currency Notes. Therefore, a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.