SANDEEP N. BHATT
State of Gujarat Through Addl. Chief Secretary – Appellant
Versus
Kanubhai Dahyabhai Vyas – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The present appeal, under the provisions of Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arises from the impugned judgment and decree dated 07.09.2016 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Gandhinagar in Regular Civil Appeal No.46 of 2014, whereby the judgment and decree dated 14.05.1998 passed by the learned 3rd Additional Senior Civil Judge, Gandhinagar in Regular Civil Suit No.40 of 1999 allowing the suit in favour of the Government, is reversed.
2. Heard learned advocates.
3. While considering the pleadings of the parties, the following suggested substantial questions of law, which were subsequently added by the appellant by way of draft amendment, which are required to be considered.
(ii) Whether the learned appellate court had erred in not considering the evidence on record, particularly those relied by the trial court ?
4. It transpires that while considering the appeal by the learned appellate Court below, it has framed the following points for its determination in paragraph 7 and findings are recorded qua them accordingly in the impugned judgment, wh
The duty of the appellate court to comply with the provisions of Order 41 Rule 31 of the CPC, consider evidence on record, and frame proper points for determination.
Compliance with the mandatory provisions of Order 41 Rule 31 of the Code of Civil Procedure is essential for the validity of the first appellate court judgment.
Mandatory compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 of the Civil Procedure Code and the need for the First Appellate Court to independently assess the evidence and provide reasons for its decision on each poi....
Mandatory compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 of the Civil Procedure Code for the First Appellate Court to independently assess evidence, frame points for consideration, and decide the appeal in accorda....
Compliance with procedural rules, re-appreciation of evidence, and independent conclusion on issues are mandatory for the First Appellate Court.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory requirement for the first appellate court to comply with Order 41 Rule 31 of the Civil Procedure Code and Rule 414 of the Bombay Civi....
Mandatory compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 of the Civil Procedure Code and the need for the First Appellate Court to independently assess evidence and frame points for consideration.
Compliance with procedural requirements, including the obligation to frame points for consideration under Order 41 Rule 31 of the Civil Procedure Code, is mandatory for the First Appellate Court in d....
The First Appellate Court is obligated to comply with the provisions of Order 41 Rule 31 of C.P.C. and recent pronouncements of the Hon’ble Apex Court and the High Court, and failure to do so may res....
Mandatory compliance with procedural requirements under Order 41 Rule 31 of the CPC is essential for valid appellate judgments; non-compliance renders decisions unsustainable.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.