Back
HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
Mahendrasinh Amarsinh Patel – Appellant
Versus
Collector And District Magistrate, Panchmahal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The petitioner has preferred present petition under Articles 14, 16, 19 and 226 of the Constitution of India and challenged inaction on the part of the respondents seeking below mentioned relief/s:-
(B) Your Lordship be pleased to issue appropriate writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ, order or direction which the Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper declaring that the action of the respondents terminating the services of the petitioner as arbitrary, illegal and against the principle of natural justice because the petit
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the Constitution of India, specifically Article 14, Article 16, Article 19, and Article 226, in the context of the petitio....
Once a judicial order regarding service benefits and pay fixation attains finality, the state is bound to implement it in its entirety. Authorities cannot circumvent such mandates through internal de....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner's appointment is to be treated as an appointment in the post of Peon from the date of his initial appointment on 30.10.2006, an....
Suspension without payment of subsistence allowance for an indefinite period is illegal and violative of the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
Termination of temporary employment – Any promotion given to petitioner consequent to his continuance in service on strength of interim order would automatically fall to ground once Special Leave Pet....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
