IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SUNITA AGARWAL, ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, JJ.
The Sabarkantha Jilla Sahkari Dudh Utpadak Sangh Limited – Appellant
Versus
The Vasana (Khed) Dudh Utpadak Sahkari Mandali Limited Through Chairman & Ors. – Respondents
R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 196 of 2024 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2546 of 2024 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2024 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 197 of 2024 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2583 of 2024 R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 201 of 2024
Decided on : 23-02-2024
Election Process - Gujarat Specified Co-operative Societies Elections to Committee Rules, 1982 - Rule 3, Rule 4, Rule 5, Rule 6, Rule 7, Rule 9, Rule 11, Rule 16 - The court discussed the application of the Rules' 1982 in the election process, emphasizing that the applicable bye-laws on the date of commencement of the election process govern the entire process of election. The court held that the Returning Officer is obliged to act as per the bye-laws, and the operation and implementation of the Note No.3 contained in the Election Programme dated 09.02.2024 is liable to be stayed.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved a challenge to the note put up by the Returning Officer in the Election Programme, suggesting that the amended bye-laws approved by the Registrar, Co-operative Societies would be binding. The key issue was whether the amended bye-laws could be applied in the election process, which had already commenced before the approval of the amendments.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the election process commenced on 30.01.2024 with the publication of the provisional list of voters, and the applicable bye-laws on that date governed the entire process of election. The court held that the operation and implementation of the Note No.3 contained in the Election Programme dated 09.02.2024 is liable to be stayed.
Issues: The issues addressed by the court were the date of commencement of the election process and whether the Returning Officer could decide that the election would be held as per the amended bye-laws, if the process had already commenced prior to 09.02.2024.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the applicable bye-laws on the date of commencement of the election process govern the entire process of election, and the Returning Officer is obliged to act as per the bye-laws. The court emphasized that the election process cannot be bifurcated into two stages for applying different rules or sets of bye-laws.
Final Decision: The appeals were dismissed, and the operation and implementation of the Note No.3 contained in the Election Programme dated 09.02.2024 were stayed. Consequently, connected Civil Applications also stand dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
SUNITA AGARWAL, J.
1. The above noted four appeals are directed against the interim order dated 20.02.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in entertaining a challenge to the note put up by the Returning Officer in the Election Programme published on 09.02.2024 which suggests that the order dated 09.02.2024 passed by the Registrar, Co-operative Societies would be binding, whereby one of the amendment proposed in the bye-laws has been approved.
2. The appellants before us are the District Co-operative Union, namely Sabarkantha Jilla Sahakari Dudh Utpadan Singh Limited impleaded through the Senior Manager (HR, Marketing) and few members of the said Union.
3. Learned Single Judge has noted that the election of the specified Co-operative Societies are governed by the provisions of the Gujarat Specified Co-operative Societies Elections to Committee Rules, 1982 (“the Rules’1982) and commences from the stage of delimitation of the constituencies, publication of the provisional list of voters and further followed by Rule 5, Rule 6 and Rule 7 of the Rules’ 1982 till the preparation of the final list of voters. It was noted that there is no dispute about the fact that the final list of voters was published on 09.02.2024 before passing of the order by the Registrar, Co-operative Societies amending the bye-laws. It was prima facie opined that such amended byelaws cannot be applied retrospectively and prospective effect can be given or else it may result in taking away or alter the duly vested rights of a member in a society.
4. Further noticing decision in Shri Sant Sadguru Janardan Swami vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors., (2001) 8 SCC 509, it was observed by the learned Single Judge that the rules framed for election of a specified society are a complete Code in itself providing for the entire process of election, beginning from the stage of preparation of provisional voter list, decision on the objection by the Collector, finalization of the electoral rolls, holding of elections and declaration of results of the election. The preparation of the provisional voters list would, therefore, be an integral part of the election process.
5. On the above two counts, the learned Single Judge has stayed the operation and implementation of the Note No. ‘3’ contained in the Election Programme dated 09.02.2024.
6. It may further be noted that the Note No.’3’ in the Election Programme was pertaining to the amendment in the bye-laws of the Society, which was approved by the Registrar on 09.02.2024 itself. The question before us, thus, is as to whether the amended bye-laws which were approved on 09.02.2024 by the Registrar, can be invoked/ applied in the election process which was already set in motion with completion of the preliminary stages of election such as delimitation of constituencies, preparation of the provisional list of voters, consideration of objection and declaration of the final list of voters.
7. All the above noted processes were admittedly completed by 09.02.2024 when the final list of voters were published.
8. To answer the above question, we raised a pertinent query to the learned Senior Counsels appearing for the appellants as to what would be the dates of commencement of the election process, in the instant case.
9. The learned Senior counsels have made their submissions in different ways to assert that the election process can be said to have commenced from the date of declaration of the election programme in accordance with the Rule 16 of the Rules’ 1982.
10. Mr. Prakash Jani, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants would submit that the Annual General meeting of the Board of the Societies was called in the month of June, 2023 (30.06.2023), to amend the bye-laws in relation to the election of the Society; 743 members voted in favour of the amendment, whereas only three(3) opposed. It was forwarded to the Registrar, Co-operative Societies, who had granted approval on 09.02.2024. The Election Officer was appointed on
Rajkot District Co-operative Bank Limited vs. State of Gujarat reported in 2015(13) SCC 401
Shri Sant Sadguru Janardan Swami vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors.
AI
The applicable bye-laws on the date of commencement of the election process govern the entire process of election, and the Returning Officer is obliged to act as per the bye-laws.
The court ruled that the provisional voters' list must be based on the correct date as per statutory rules, emphasizing compliance with election regulations.
The court emphasized that judicial intervention is warranted in election matters when there are clear violations of statutory provisions, despite the general principle of non-interference in ongoing ....
Where orders are passed condoning the delay, they are discretionary orders and ought not to be interfered with.
The Deputy Collector had no jurisdiction to review his own order passed under Rule 3(A)(9) of the Rules, 1982.
Compliance with statutory election procedures within cooperative societies is mandatory to ensure valid electoral processes; neglecting to notify ineligible voters invalidates election actions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.