BHARGAV D. KARIA, NIRAL R. MEHTA
Darshan Processors – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA)
1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Hiren J. Trivedi for the petitioner, learned advocate Mr.Hirak Shah for learned advocate Mr. Nikunt Raval for respondent no.2 and learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Raj Tanna for the respondent State.
2. Since issue involved in all these petitions is identical, they have been heard together would be disposed of by this common judgment.
3. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned advocate Mr.Hirak Shah for learned advocate Mr. Nikunt Raval waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent no.2 and learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Raj Tanna waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent State.
4. For the sake of convenience, facts are noted from Special Civil Application No.2114 of 2021.
5. By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.